Successful use of intra-arrest thrombolysis for electrical storm due to acute myocardial infarction
Karina Reyner1, Alan C Heffner2, J Lee Garvey1
1Department of Emergency Medicine, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC.
Insights
Intra-arrest thrombolysis may rapidly restore circulation in cardiac arrest patients with acute myocardial infarction. This case highlights potential benefits in select patients experiencing electrical storm.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Emergency Medicine
- Critical Care
Background:
- Acute vascular thrombotic events, such as myocardial infarction and pulmonary embolism, are primary causes of sudden cardiac arrest.
- Current guidelines recommend against routine intra-arrest thrombolysis due to ongoing debate regarding its efficacy.
- Electrical storm, characterized by recurrent ventricular fibrillation, poses a significant challenge in cardiac arrest management.
Observation:
- A patient presented with prolonged refractory ventricular fibrillation electrical storm.
- Intra-arrest electrocardiographic and sonographic findings confirmed acute myocardial infarction as the underlying cause.
- Rescue intra-arrest thrombolysis was administered as a last resort.
Findings:
- Rapid return of spontaneous circulation was achieved following the intra-arrest thrombolytic bolus.
- The case demonstrates a potential positive outcome in a refractory cardiac arrest scenario.
- Successful thrombolysis reversed the acute thrombotic event, facilitating ROSC.
Implications:
- This case suggests that intra-arrest thrombolysis could be a viable rescue strategy in selected cardiac arrest patients with confirmed acute myocardial infarction.
- Careful patient selection, based on clear evidence of acute thrombosis, is crucial for optimizing outcomes.
- Further research is warranted to define the precise role and optimal use of thrombolysis during cardiac arrest.
Abstract:
Acute vascular thrombotic disease, including acute myocardial infarction and pulmonary embolism, accounts for 70% of sudden outpatient cardiac arrest. The role of intra-arrest thrombolytic administration aimed at reversing the underlying cause of cardiac arrest remains an area of debate with recent guidelines advising against routine use. We present a case of prolonged refractory ventricular fibrillation electrical storm in a patient who demonstrated intra-arrest electrocardiographic and sonographic markers confirming acute myocardial infarction. Return of spontaneous circulation was rapidly achieved after rescue intra-arrest bolus thrombolysis.Highlights of this case are discussed in the context of the current evidence for thrombolytic therapy in cardiac arrest with specific attention to the issue of patient selection.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
ECG Interpretation of Arrhythmias II: Atrial, Junctional and Ventricular Arrhythmias
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management


