Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 15, 2026

Assessing Specificity of Anticancer Drugs In Vitro
Published on: March 23, 2016
[The history of developing anticancer Drugs and their evaluation guidelines in Japan]
Abstract:
The cancer therapies currently available do not yet offer fully satisfactory treatments, even in 21st century, and efforts and progress are being made daily in the area of drug development. Anticancer drugs, which play the leading role in cancer therapy, are being developed dynamically around the world, and Japan is not an exception. Looking back on the history of developing anticancer drugs, cytotoxic drugs were the mainstream of drug development until the end of the 20th century. In the 21st century, they have been replaced by molecularly targeted drugs, and thus the development of cytotoxic drugs has been declining rapidly. There were various approaches to the development of anticancer drugs and clinical trial endpoints until the 1980s. In 1991, the "Guidelines for Clinical Evaluation Methods of Anti-Cancer Drugs in Japan" was issued. From 2000 onwards, there was vigorous discussion on the clinical trial endpoints of anticancer drugs in the United States. In conjunction with this discussion, the "Guidelines for Clinical Evaluation Methods of Anti-Cancer Drugs in Japan" was revised in 2005. The revised guidelines required survival data at the time of filing a new drug application (NDA) as a general rule. Around 2005, a bridging strategy was promoted as the "International Conference on Harmonization E5" was promulgated among Japan, the U.S. and EU, resulting in an outflow of clinical trials to overseas, with more non-Japanese survival data generated outside of Japan used for NDAs than Japanese data. Subsequently, the "Guideline for Basic Principles on Global Clinical Trials" was issued in 2007, which promoted the change in the mainstream approach from a bridging strategy to a pivotal, global study involving Japan. Thus, an era of full-fledged globalization in clinical trials began. We believe Japan will need systems to enhance the motivation for anticancer drug development, such as an expedited program or pediatric program, from now on. We hope that the enhancement of these systems will contribute to shortening the period required for approving an anticancer drug and reducing developmental costs. Furthermore, we expect Japan to be creating breakthrough anticancer drugs in the near future.
Insights
Cancer drug development has shifted from cytotoxic to molecularly targeted therapies. Japan
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Drug Development
- Clinical Trials
Context:
- Cancer therapies evolve, with a global shift from cytotoxic to molecularly targeted drugs.
- Japanese guidelines for anti-cancer drug evaluation have been revised, impacting clinical trial strategies.
- Globalization trends influenced clinical trial data utilization for new drug applications.
Purpose:
- To review the evolution of anticancer drug development and clinical trial guidelines in Japan.
- To analyze the impact of international harmonization and globalization on clinical trials.
- To propose system enhancements for accelerating anticancer drug development in Japan.
Summary:
- Anticancer drug development transitioned from cytotoxic to molecularly targeted agents in the 21st century.
- Japanese guidelines evolved, requiring survival data and adapting to global clinical trial trends.
- Globalization led to pivotal global studies, necessitating system improvements for Japan's role.
Impact:
- The evolution of guidelines and globalization has reshaped drug development and approval processes.
- Enhanced systems like expedited and pediatric programs could shorten approval times and reduce costs.
- Japan aims to foster breakthrough anticancer drug creation through improved development environments.
Related Concept Videos
Drug Regulation
Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity
Clinical Trials: Overview
Preclinical Development: Overview
Inhibition of Cdk Activity
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...

