Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test I01:17

Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test I

1.1K
The Wald-Wolfowitz test, also known as the runs test, is a nonparametric statistical test used to assess the randomness of a sequence of two different types of elements (e.g., positive/negative values, successes/failures). It examines whether the order of the elements in a sequence is random or if there is a pattern or trend present. This nonparametric test applies to any ordered data despite the population and sample data distribution, even if a higher sample size is available.
The test works...
1.1K
Test for Homogeneity01:23

Test for Homogeneity

2.6K
The goodness–of–fit test can be used to decide whether a population fits a given distribution, but it will not suffice to decide whether two populations follow the same unknown distribution. A different test, called the test for homogeneity, can be used to conclude whether two populations have the same distribution. To calculate the test statistic for a test for homogeneity, follow the same procedure as with the test of independence. The hypotheses for the test for homogeneity can...
2.6K
Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test II01:17

Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test II

661
The Wald-Wolfowitz runs test, commonly referred to as the runs test, is a nonparametric test used to assess the randomness of ordered data. The test evaluates the number of runs, which are consecutive sequences of similar elements within the data. If the number of runs is significantly higher or lower than expected, the data is considered non-random, indicating a detectable pattern or structure.
For binary data, runs are identified using symbols such as + and −, or equivalently, 1s and...
661
Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test01:02

Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test

5.0K
Sometimes, a data set can have a recorded numerical observation that greatly  deviates from the rest of the data. Assuming that the data is normally distributed, a statistical method called the Grubbs test can be used to determine whether the observation is truly an outlier.  To perform a two-tailed Grubbs test, first, calculate the absolute difference between the outlier and the mean. Then, calculate the ratio between this difference and the standard deviation of the sample. This...
5.0K
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

725
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
725
Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

4.7K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
4.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Alirocumab Plus Cemiplimab in Immunorefractory NSCLC: A Single Arm Phase 2 Study.

Research square·2026
Same author

Correction: Kim et al. Identification of <i>GREM-1</i> and <i>GAS6</i> as Specific Biomarkers for Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts Derived from Patients with Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. <i>Cancers</i> 2025, <i>17</i>, 2858.

Cancers·2026
Same author

Alirocumab plus cemiplimab in advanced immuno-refractory metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: an ongoing multi-center phase II study.

Future oncology (London, England)·2026
Same author

ZnI<sub>2</sub>-Mediated Cyanomethyl Ether Synthesis from MEM Ethers with Trimethylsilyl Cyanide.

The Journal of organic chemistry·2026
Same author

Phase II Efficacy and Safety of Pembrolizumab with Platinum Based Chemotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients with Untreated, Asymptomatic Brain Metastasis (PHOEBS).

Cancer research and treatment·2026
Same author

Amivantamab Monotherapy for Lung Adenocarcinoma With Leptomeningeal Seeding: A Case Report.

Respirology case reports·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 15, 2026

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

8.1K

Comparison of operational characteristics for binary tests with clustered data.

Minjung Kwak1, Sang-Won Um2, Sin-Ho Jung3

  • 1Department of Statistics, Yeungnam University Gyeongsan, Gyeongbuk, 712-749, South Korea.

Statistics in Medicine
|March 25, 2015
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a new statistical method for comparing diagnostic tests, focusing on predictive values like positive and negative predictive value. The approach is validated through simulations and real-world lung cancer patient data.

Keywords:
clustered binary outcomenegative predictive valuepositive predictive valuesensitivityspecificity

More Related Videos

Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations
12:27

Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations

Published on: February 15, 2017

7.5K
Novel Object Recognition and Object Location Behavioral Testing in Mice on a Budget
05:57

Novel Object Recognition and Object Location Behavioral Testing in Mice on a Budget

Published on: November 20, 2018

60.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 15, 2026

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

8.1K
Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations
12:27

Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations

Published on: February 15, 2017

7.5K
Novel Object Recognition and Object Location Behavioral Testing in Mice on a Budget
05:57

Novel Object Recognition and Object Location Behavioral Testing in Mice on a Budget

Published on: November 20, 2018

60.1K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Statistics
  • Diagnostic Test Evaluation
  • Biomarker Research

Background:

  • Statistical methods for comparing diagnostic test sensitivity and specificity are established.
  • Comparative inference for predictive values (positive predictive value, negative predictive value) lacks robust methodology.
  • Multi-site studies with varying subject numbers present unique analytical challenges.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and present a novel statistical approach for comparing operating characteristics of two diagnostic tests.
  • To specifically address the comparative analysis of positive predictive value and negative predictive value.
  • To provide a method with simple variance calculation for enhanced applicability.

Main Methods:

  • The study proposes a new statistical framework for comparative analysis of diagnostic tests.
  • The methodology accommodates multi-site data with varying numbers of subjects per site.
  • Focus is placed on comparing tests using the difference between positive and negative predictive values.

Main Results:

  • Simulation studies demonstrate the effectiveness and performance of the developed statistical approach.
  • The methodology is illustrated using real-world data from lung cancer patients.
  • The approach allows for reliable comparison of diagnostic test operating characteristics, including predictive values.

Conclusions:

  • The new statistical method offers a reliable approach for comparing diagnostic tests, particularly concerning predictive values.
  • The methodology is suitable for multi-site studies and provides a practical tool for researchers.
  • This work advances the comparative statistical analysis of diagnostic tests in clinical research.