Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 15, 2026

Implantation of Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD) in Juvenile Landrace Swine: A LVAD Implantation Model of Pediatric Heart Failure
Published on: January 16, 2026
Early and mid-term outcomes of left ventricular assist device implantation and future prospects
Hiroki Hata1, Tomoyuki Fujita2, Yusuke Shimahara2
1Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, 5-7-1 Fujishiro-dai, Suita, Osaka, 565-8565, Japan. hatahiro@ncvc.go.jp.
Insights
Both implantable continuous-flow and extracorporeal pulsatile-flow ventricular assist devices show satisfactory outcomes. However, complications like infections and cerebrovascular events require further investigation for destination therapy in Japan.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Devices
- Surgical Outcomes
Background:
- Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) use is increasing for heart failure patients.
- Destination therapy with LVADs is not currently approved in Japan.
- Continuous-flow and pulsatile-flow LVADs represent different technological approaches.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare early and mid-term outcomes of implantable continuous-flow LVADs versus extracorporeal pulsatile-flow LVADs.
- To discuss the feasibility of LVADs as destination therapy in the Japanese context.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 72 patients undergoing LVAD implantation from January 2009 to September 2013.
- Comparison between 40 patients with extracorporeal pulsatile-flow LVADs (ex-VAD) and 32 with implantable continuous-flow LVADs (im-VAD).
Main Results:
- Actuarial survival rates at 1 and 3 years were comparable between groups (e.g., 92.3% vs. 96.4% at 1 year).
- High rates of cerebrovascular complications (approx. 50% within 1 year) and exit-site infections (90% in ex-VAD vs. 50% in im-VAD at 6 months) were observed.
- Readmission rates were significant, primarily due to driveline exit-site infections and cerebrovascular complications.
Conclusions:
- Both ex-VAD and im-VAD demonstrated satisfactory early and mid-term outcomes.
- A considerable burden of postoperative complications necessitates further study.
- Additional data are required to consider LVADs for destination therapy in Japan.
Objectives:
Although implantable left ventricular assist device use as a bridge to heart transplantation is increasing, its permanent use as destination therapy is not permitted in Japan. This retrospective review assessed early and mid-term outcomes of implantable continuous-flow left ventricular assist device compared with extracorporeal pulsatile-flow left ventricular assist device implantation. Issues regarding left ventricular assist device as destination therapy are discussed.
Methods:
From January 2009 to September 2013, 72 patients underwent left ventricular assist device implantation at our institute. Forty patients were supported by extracorporeal pulsatile-flow left ventricular assist devices (ex-VAD group) and 32 patients with implantable continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (im-VAD group).
Results:
The median duration of ventricular assist device support was 563 days. The actuarial survival rates at 1 and 3 years were 92.3 and 79.2 % in the ex-VAD group and 96.4 and 72.3 % in the im-VAD group, respectively. Approximately 50 % of patients in both groups developed cerebrovascular complications within 1 year postoperatively. Six months post-implantation, almost 90 % of the ex-VAD group patients suffered exit-site infection compared with about 50 % in the im-VAD group. Readmission rate was 1.74 per patient-year; major causes were driveline exit-site infection (52 %) and cerebrovascular complication (14 %).
Conclusions:
Early and mid-term outcomes were satisfactory after both extracorporeal pulsatile-flow left ventricular assist device and implantable continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation, although a considerable level of postoperative complications was observed. More data after left ventricular assist device surgery are needed to enable its consideration as a destination therapy option in Japan.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies

