Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 15, 2026
In Vitro and In Vivo Assessment of T, B and Myeloid Cells Suppressive Activity and Humoral Responses from Transplant Recipients
Published on: August 12, 2017
A Banff Component Scoring-based Histologic Assessment of Bortezomib-based Antibody-mediated Rejection Therapy
Basma Sadaka1, Nicole S Ejaz, Adele R Shields
11 Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH. 2 Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH. 3 The Christ Hospital, Cincinnati, OH. 4 Department of Pathology, The Christ Hospital, Cincinnati, OH. 5 Department of Pathology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH. 6 Department of Pathology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital, Cincinnati, OH.
Background:
Histology remains a cornerstone for antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) diagnosis. Little data exist supporting histology for assessing therapeutic responses. This study evaluates histologic components in assessing AMR therapeutic responses.
Methods:
Antibody-mediated rejection was diagnosed using Antibody Working Group criteria and Banff component scoring, and C4d staining data were analyzed. Statistics included independent and paired samples t test, χ(2), Fisher exact, or the Wilcoxon-signed rank test. Fifty-five AMR patients were analyzed. Early AMR was defined as occurring within 6 months after transplantation and treated with a single rituximab dose and 4 bortezomib doses preceded by plasmapheresis. Allograft biopsies were performed within 48 hours of treatment; repeat biopsy was performed 14 to 21 days later.
Results:
Early AMR demonstrated histologic improvement in mean scores for acute Banff components glomerulitis (g), C4d, g+ peritubular capillaritis (ptc) and acute composite score, but showed deterioration in chronic Banff components tubular atrophy and interstitial fibrosis. Late AMR showed improved mean scores for acute Banff components tubulitis, interstitial inflammation, g, ptc, g + ptc, C4d, and acute composite score, but chronic scores did not change. Significant changes in distribution of Banff scores after treatment were observed for g, C4d, tubular atrophy, and interstitial fibrosis scores in early AMR patients and tubulitis, interstitial inflammation, g, ptc, and C4d in late AMR.
Conclusions:
These results show that: (1) Banff component scoring provides insights into histologic responses to AMR therapy and may provide a potential endpoint for clinical AMR trials. (2) Early and late AMR demonstrate differences in acute and chronic Banff components at the time of the AMR diagnostic biopsy, as well as differential responses to AMR therapy.
