Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 15, 2026

A Multiplex Serological Assay for the Detection of Antibody Responses to Arboviruses
Published on: November 4, 2025
Impact of serology and molecular methods on improving the microbiologic diagnosis of infective endocarditis in Egypt
Amany Aly El-Kholy1, Nevine Gamal El-din El-Rachidi1, Mervat Gaber El-Enany1
1Clinical Pathology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.
Background:
Conventional diagnosis of infective endocarditis (IE) is based mainly on culture-dependent methods that may fail because of antibiotic therapy or fastidious microorganisms.
Objectives:
We aimed to evaluate the added values of serological and molecular methods for diagnosis of infective endocarditis.
Patients And Methods:
One hundred and fifty-six cases of suspected endocarditis were enrolled in the study. For each patient, three sets of blood culture were withdrawn and serum sample was collected for Brucella, Bartonella and Coxiella burnetii antibody testing. Galactomannan antigen was added if fungal endocarditis was suspected. Broad range PCR targeting bacterial and fungal pathogens were done on blood culture bottles followed by sequencing. Culture and molecular studies were done on excised valve tissue when available.
Results:
One hundred and thirty-two cases were diagnosed as definite IE. Causative organisms were detected by blood cultures in 40 (30.3 %) of cases. Blood culture-negative endocarditis (BCNE) represented 69.7 %. Of these cases, PCR followed by sequencing on blood and valvular tissue could diagnose five cases of Aspergillus flavus. Eleven patients with BCNE (8.3 %) were diagnosed as zoonotic endocarditis by serology and PCR including five cases of Brucella spp, four cases of Bartonella spp and two cases of Coxiella burnetii. PCR detected three cases of Brucella spp and two cases of Bartonella spp, while cases of Coxiella burnetii were PCR negative. The results of all diagnostic tools decreased the percentage of non-identified cases of BCNE from 69.7 to 49.2 %.
Conclusion:
Our data underline the role of serologic and molecular tools for the diagnosis of blood culture-negative endocarditis.
Insights
Serological and molecular methods significantly improve the diagnosis of infective endocarditis (IE), especially in blood culture-negative endocarditis (BCNE) cases. These advanced techniques enhance pathogen detection, reducing the percentage of unidentified IE cases.
Area of Science:
- Infectious Diseases
- Microbiology
- Medical Diagnostics
Background:
- Conventional infective endocarditis (IE) diagnosis relies on culture-dependent methods.
- These methods can be unreliable due to prior antibiotic use or difficult-to-grow microorganisms.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the added diagnostic value of serological and molecular methods for IE.
- To improve the detection rates of causative agents in blood culture-negative endocarditis (BCNE).
Main Methods:
- Study enrolled 156 suspected IE cases.
- Blood cultures, serological tests (Brucella, Bartonella, Coxiella burnetii antibodies), and galactomannan antigen testing were performed.
- Broad-range PCR on blood culture bottles and valve tissue, followed by sequencing, was utilized.
Main Results:
- Definite IE was diagnosed in 132 cases; blood cultures identified causative agents in only 30.3%.
- BCNE accounted for 69.7% of cases; molecular and serological methods reduced unidentified cases to 49.2%.
- PCR and serology diagnosed zoonotic IE (Brucella, Bartonella, Coxiella burnetii) in 8.3% of BCNE cases.
Conclusions:
- Serological and molecular tools are crucial for diagnosing BCNE.
- These methods significantly enhance the identification of causative pathogens in IE.
- The study highlights the limitations of traditional methods and the benefits of advanced diagnostics.
Related Concept Videos
Automated Microbial Diagnostics
Methods of Classification and Identification
Endocarditis III: Medical Management
Endocarditis II: Clinical Features of Infective Endocarditis
Myocarditis II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Endocarditis I: Introduction

