Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Automatic Evaluation of Small Bowel Cleanliness in Capsule Endoscopy: A Comparative Study of Four Preparations using Artificial Intelligence.

Endoscopy international open·2026
Same author

CeraMIRScan: Mid-infrared OCT Scan Dataset for Ceramic Quality Assessment.

Scientific data·2026
Same author

Behavioral and kinematic outcomes of adaptive pauses in VR social cognition training for autistic children.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same author

Feasibility of the Meta Quest 3 for upper limb kinematic analysis: accuracy, consistency, agreement and reliability.

Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation·2026
Same author

Multimodal analysis of spontaneous speech for predicting food liking: Integrating linguistic and prosodic features with machine learning.

Food research international (Ottawa, Ont.)·2026
Same author

Transference of spatial and visual memory from virtual environments to the real world. Implications for clinical and health interventions.

International journal of clinical and health psychology : IJCHP·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 15, 2026

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Remote Rehabilitation with Virtual Reality and Electromyography
04:06

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Remote Rehabilitation with Virtual Reality and Electromyography

Published on: January 12, 2024

1.2K

Tracking systems for virtual rehabilitation: objective performance vs. subjective experience. A practical scenario.

Roberto Lloréns1,2, Enrique Noé3, Valery Naranjo4

  • 1Instituto Interuniversitario de Investigación en Bioingeniería y Tecnología Orientada al Ser Humano, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain. rllorens@labhuman.com.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|March 27, 2015
PubMed
Summary

Motion tracking systems for virtual reality rehabilitation vary in accuracy and jitter. User preferences differ significantly between healthy individuals, stroke survivors, and therapists, influencing system design.

More Related Videos

A Rehabilitation Program of Exoskeleton-assisted Body Weight-Supported Treadmill Training with Non-immersive Virtual Reality for Stroke Patients
06:00

A Rehabilitation Program of Exoskeleton-assisted Body Weight-Supported Treadmill Training with Non-immersive Virtual Reality for Stroke Patients

Published on: May 16, 2025

1.5K
Measuring the Kinematics of Daily Living Movements with Motion Capture Systems in Virtual Reality
08:45

Measuring the Kinematics of Daily Living Movements with Motion Capture Systems in Virtual Reality

Published on: April 5, 2018

8.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 15, 2026

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Remote Rehabilitation with Virtual Reality and Electromyography
04:06

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Remote Rehabilitation with Virtual Reality and Electromyography

Published on: January 12, 2024

1.2K
A Rehabilitation Program of Exoskeleton-assisted Body Weight-Supported Treadmill Training with Non-immersive Virtual Reality for Stroke Patients
06:00

A Rehabilitation Program of Exoskeleton-assisted Body Weight-Supported Treadmill Training with Non-immersive Virtual Reality for Stroke Patients

Published on: May 16, 2025

1.5K
Measuring the Kinematics of Daily Living Movements with Motion Capture Systems in Virtual Reality
08:45

Measuring the Kinematics of Daily Living Movements with Motion Capture Systems in Virtual Reality

Published on: April 5, 2018

8.2K

Area of Science:

  • Rehabilitation Engineering
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Motion tracking systems are integral to virtual reality (VR) interventions, translating real-world movements into virtual environments.
  • Performance parameters of tracking solutions are dictated by their underlying physical principles.
  • Specific requirements for rehabilitation applications necessitate careful evaluation of these systems.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the accuracy and jitter of optical, electromagnetic, and skeleton tracking systems in a practical rehabilitation scenario.
  • To analyze the subjective perceptions and preferences of healthy subjects, stroke survivors, and physical therapists regarding these tracking systems.
  • To determine if user preferences align with objective performance metrics for VR-based rehabilitation.

Main Methods:

  • Evaluated three motion tracking solutions: optical, electromagnetic, and skeleton tracking.
  • Measured accuracy and jitter in a practical setting relevant to rehabilitation.
  • Collected subjective feedback from 19 healthy subjects, 22 stroke survivors, and 14 physical therapists.

Main Results:

  • Optical tracking demonstrated the highest accuracy (1.074 ± 0.417 cm).
  • Electromagnetic tracking yielded the poorest accuracy (11.027 ± 2.364 cm) but offered the best jitter (0.324 ± 0.093 cm).
  • Skeleton tracking showed the worst jitter (1.522 ± 0.858 cm). Healthy users and therapists preferred skeleton tracking, while stroke survivors favored optical tracking.

Conclusions:

  • Subjective user preferences for motion tracking systems in VR rehabilitation are population-dependent.
  • Optical tracking excels in accuracy, while electromagnetic tracking offers superior jitter control.
  • System design for VR rehabilitation should integrate both objective performance data and diverse user population preferences.