Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 15, 2026

A Rat Model of Tibial Cortex Transverse Transport for the Treatment of Lower Limb Ischemia
Published on: March 6, 2026
Endovascular intervention for tibial artery occlusive disease in patients with critical limb ischemia
Zhen S Huang1, Darren B Schneider1
1Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medical Center, 525 East 68th Street, P-707, New York, NY 10065.
Insights
Endovascular treatments for critical limb ischemia (CLI) are evolving, with balloon angioplasty showing promise for high-risk patients. More research is needed to clarify the efficacy of various endovascular modalities for infrapopliteal arterial disease (IP CLI).
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Interventional Cardiology
- Endovascular Interventions
Background:
- Surgical bypass is the traditional treatment for critical limb ischemia (CLI) due to infrapopliteal arterial disease (IP CLI).
- Endovascular techniques are increasingly used for IP CLI, particularly in high-risk surgical patients.
- Controversies persist regarding the optimal endovascular approach for IP CLI.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the current evidence and controversies surrounding endovascular interventions for IP CLI.
- To evaluate the efficacy and limitations of various endovascular modalities.
- To emphasize the importance of patient selection and tailored treatment strategies.
Main Methods:
- Review of recent literature on endovascular treatments for IP CLI.
- Analysis of data on percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty, bare-metal stents, drug-eluting stents, drug-coated balloons, and atherectomy.
- Discussion of retrograde versus antegrade access techniques.
Main Results:
- Percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty is supported by recent literature but has limited durability.
- Bare-metal stents lack supportive data for primary use; drug-eluting stents show improved patency but not significant clinical benefit over bare-metal stents.
- Drug-coated balloons require further safety and efficacy data; atherectomy shows variable results with unclear benefits.
- Retrograde tibial/pedal access is a described alternative to antegrade access.
Conclusions:
- Level I evidence is needed to clarify the efficacy of different endovascular modalities for IP CLI.
- Proper patient selection and tailoring interventions to individual anatomy and disease are crucial.
- Endovascular interventions should be considered alongside open surgical repair for IP CLI.
Abstract:
Surgical bypass has traditionally been the gold standard for treating critical limb ischemia caused by isolated infrapopliteal arterial disease (IP CLI). However, as endovascular techniques continue to progress, they are increasingly applied to this patient population, especially to the high-risk surgical cohort or patients with limited surgical options. This enthusiasm to employ endovascular interventions in IP CLI is accompanied by persistent controversies, as demonstrated in the recent literature. Percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty has been the predominant endovascular intervention applied to treat IP CLI and recent literature supports its role. The durability of percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty is limited, and thus this intervention is recommended for high-risk patients with limited life expectancy. Bare-metal stents for IP CLI currently do not have supportive data to warrant their use as a primary treatment. Newer drug-eluting stents improve patency and prevent restenosis, but they do not significantly improve patient clinical status compared with bare-metal stents alone. Drug-coated balloons are still relatively new tools in this arena and evidence of their safety and clear efficacy are still lacking. The data on atherectomy, in all of its forms, for IP CLI are overall variable, without any clear benefit to justify its increased complication risks and costs over other modalities. Use of retrograde tibial/pedal access for treating IP CLI as a viable alternative to antegrade access and treatment from a totally retrograde approach has recently been described. Level I evidence to aid in clarifying the true efficacy for each of these endovascular modalities is greatly needed. As we await these data, we must remember that, as with any arterial intervention, proper patient selection is extremely important and the intervention, whether endovascular or open surgical repair, should be tailored to the individual patient's anatomy and disease characteristics.
More Related Videos
13:48Reduction of Radiation Exposure during Endovascular Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Disease Combining Fiber Optic RealShape Technology and Intravascular Ultrasound
Published on: April 21, 2023
07:25Predicting Amputation using Local Circulating Mononuclear Progenitor Cells in Angioplasty-treated Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia
Published on: September 22, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
Varicose Veins II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation