Complete versus culprit-only revascularization in patients with multi-vessel disease undergoing primary percutaneous
Islam Y Elgendy1, Tianyao Huo1, Ahmed Mahmoud1
1Department of Medicine, University of Florida, 1600 SW Archer Road, P.O. Box 100277, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA.
Insights
Complete revascularization in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with multi-vessel disease significantly reduces major adverse cardiac events. This strategy, performed during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), lowers the need for urgent revascularization.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Optimal revascularization strategy for multi-vessel coronary disease in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains debated.
- Current guidelines do not definitively favor complete over culprit-only revascularization in this high-risk population.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy and safety of complete versus culprit-only revascularization strategies in STEMI patients with multi-vessel disease.
- To determine the impact of complete revascularization on major adverse cardiac events and need for urgent revascularization.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing complete versus culprit-only revascularization in STEMI patients.
- Searched Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane Register, and conference proceedings.
- Random effects models were used to calculate summary risk ratios.
Main Results:
- Six trials including 1,190 patients were analyzed, with a mean follow-up of 20.5 months.
- Complete revascularization significantly reduced major adverse cardiac events (RR 0.57, p < 0.001), mainly due to a lower risk of urgent revascularization (RR 0.55, p = 0.01).
- A trend towards reduced mortality or myocardial infarction was observed with complete revascularization, though not statistically significant (RR 0.56, p = 0.06).
Conclusions:
- Complete revascularization of significant coronary lesions during primary PCI in STEMI patients with multi-vessel disease improves clinical outcomes.
- The benefit is primarily driven by a reduction in the need for subsequent urgent revascularization procedures.
- Larger prospective trials are warranted to confirm the impact on mortality and myocardial infarction reduction.
Background:
The best approach for revascularization of multi-vessel coronary disease in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is controversial.
Methods:
We searched the Medline and Web of Science databases, the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, and major conference proceedings for clinical trials that randomized STEMI patients with multi-vessel disease to a complete versus culprit-only revascularization strategy. Random effects summary risk ratios (RR) were constructed using a DerSimonian-Laird model.
Results:
A total of 6 trials met our selection criteria, which yielded 1,190 patients. The mean follow-up duration was 20.5 months. The incidence of major adverse cardiac events was significantly reduced in the complete revascularization group versus the culprit-only revascularization group (RR 0.57, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.41-0.78, p < 0.001). This was due to a lower risk of urgent revascularization with complete revascularization (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.35-0.86, p = 0.01). A non-significant reduction was observed with complete versus culprit-only revascularization for the combined outcome of mortality or myocardial infarction (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.30-1.04, p = 0.06).
Conclusion:
Complete revascularization of significant coronary lesions at the time of primary PCI in patients with STEMI and multi-vessel disease was associated with better outcomes. This was primarily due to a reduction in the need for urgent revascularization. Larger trials are needed to determine if complete revascularization reduces death or myocardial infarction.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care


