Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Health-related quality of life and tobacco and alcohol consumption in Leber hereditary optic neuropathy in Sweden.

Frontiers in ophthalmology·2026

Same author

Impact of peripheral optical errors in age-related macular degeneration.

Journal of optometry·2026

Same author

Optical quality and anisotropy across the retina of Chinese children's eyes.

Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision·2026

Same author

Assessing Peripheral Focus in Myopes and Non-myopes: Introducing "Depth-of-refraction".

Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)·2026

Same author

Optometrist-guided versus self-driven subjective refraction using tunable optics: quantifying the professional's impact.

Journal of optometry·2026

Same author

Asymmetry between nasal and temporal refraction with accommodation in myopes and emmetropes.

Biomedical optics express·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 15, 2026

Visualizing Visual Adaptation

Visualizing Visual Adaptation

Published on: April 24, 2017

Blur adaptation: contrast sensitivity changes and stimulus extent.

Abinaya Priya Venkataraman¹, Simon Winter¹, Peter Unsbo¹

¹Biomedical and X-ray Physics, KTH, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.

Vision Research

|March 31, 2015

Summary

Adapting to blur in a small visual field improved foveal contrast sensitivity. However, this effect did not extend to peripheral vision or occur with larger blur adaptation fields, indicating stimulus extent is crucial.

Keywords:

Adaptation Contrast sensitivity Optical defocus

More Related Videos

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing

Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing

Published on: February 23, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 15, 2026

Visualizing Visual Adaptation

Visualizing Visual Adaptation

Published on: April 24, 2017

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing

Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing

Published on: February 23, 2024

Area of Science:

Vision science
Ophthalmology
Neuroscience

Background:

Prolonged foveal defocus impacts foveal visual functions.
The influence of peripheral blur adaptation on foveal vision remains unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate how blur adaptation in small and large visual fields affects contrast sensitivity.
To determine if blur adaptation effects are localized or widespread.

Main Methods:

Four subjects underwent blur adaptation using optical lenses (+2.00D).
Stimuli included a small (7.5°) and a large (horizontally extended) field of forest scenery.
Contrast sensitivity was measured before and after adaptation under blurred and clear conditions.

Main Results:

Small field blur adaptation led to improved foveal contrast sensitivity at mid-spatial frequencies.
These improvements were not observed in the periphery.
Large field blur adaptation did not result in significant changes in contrast sensitivity.

Conclusions:

Visual performance adaptation to blur is dependent on the lateral extent of the adapting stimulus.
Blur adaptation effects appear to be spatially specific.
Further research is needed to understand the mechanisms underlying these findings.