Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

PD Controller: Design01:26

PD Controller: Design

744
In automotive engineering, car suspension systems often employ Proportional Derivative (PD) controllers to enhance performance. PD controllers are utilized to adjust the damping force in response to road conditions. A controller, acting as an amplifier with a constant gain, demonstrates proportional control, with output directly mirroring input.
Designing a continuous-data controller requires selecting and linking components like adders and integrators, which are fundamental in Proportional,...
744
Time and frequency -Domain Interpretation of PI Control01:27

Time and frequency -Domain Interpretation of PI Control

492
Proportional-Integral (PI) controllers are essential in many control systems to improve stability and performance. They are commonly used in everyday devices like thermostats to enhance system damping and reduce steady-state error. When the zero in the controller's transfer function is optimally placed, the system benefits significantly in terms of stability and accuracy.
Acting as a low-pass filter, the PI controller slows the system's response and extends settling times. This requires...
492
Time-Domain Interpretation of PD Control01:07

Time-Domain Interpretation of PD Control

474
Proportional-Derivative (PD) control is a widely used control method in various engineering systems to enhance stability and performance. In a system with only proportional control, common issues include high maximum overshoot and oscillation, observed in both the error signal and its rate of change. This behavior can be divided into three distinct phases: initial overshoot, subsequent undershoot, and gradual stabilization.
Consider the example of control of motor torque. Initially, a positive...
474
Time and frequency -Domain Interpretation of Phase-lead Control01:24

Time and frequency -Domain Interpretation of Phase-lead Control

535
Phase-lead controllers are commonly used in various control systems to enhance response speed and stability. Adjusting the brightness on a television screen offers a practical example of phase-lead control. When contrast is enhanced, a phase-lead controller is employed. Mathematically, phase-lead control is identified when the first parameter is smaller than the second.
The design of phase-lead control involves the strategic placement of poles and zeros to balance steady-state error and system...
535
Phase-lead and Phase-lag Controllers01:22

Phase-lead and Phase-lag Controllers

632
Understanding the working function of different types of controllers can be illustrated with practical analogies, such as adjusting a stereo's volume equalizer. Cranking up the bass involves a phase-lead controller, which functions as a high-pass filter, while increasing the treble uses a phase-lag controller, which acts as a low-pass filter. PD controllers, similar to high-pass filters, enhance the system's response to high-frequency components. PI controllers, akin to low-pass...
632
PI Controller: Design01:24

PI Controller: Design

1.5K
Proportional Integral (PI) controllers are a fundamental component in modern control systems, widely used to enhance performance and mitigate steady-state errors. They are particularly effective in applications such as automatic brightness adjustment on smartphones, where they excel at mitigating steady-state errors for step-function inputs. Unlike PD controllers, which require time-varying errors to function optimally, PI controllers leverage their integral component to address residual...
1.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Radiographic Evaluation of Periapical Healing Following Single vs Multiple Visit Root Canal Treatment: A PAI Based Study.

Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences·2026
Same author

Reversal of optic disc cupping following trabeculectomy.

Journal francais d'ophtalmologie·2025
Same author

Cost-effective synthesis of zinc oxide/crab shell-derived chitosan nanocomposite: Insights into its biomedical applications.

International journal of biological macromolecules·2024
Same author

Fluorophore-quencher complexes (Cu<sup>2+</sup>/Al<sup>3+</sup>) of coumarin Schiff bases as chemosensors for the detection of L-glutamic acid and L-arginine: <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in vivo</i> studies.

Dalton transactions (Cambridge, England : 2003)·2024
Same author

Classic anterior lenticonus in Alport syndrome.

Journal francais d'ophtalmologie·2024
Same author

Superconductivity coupling of harmonic resonant oscillators: Homogeneous and heterogeneous extreme multistability with multi-scrolls.

Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 15, 2026

Interactive and Visualized Online Experimentation System for Engineering Education and Research
08:35

Interactive and Visualized Online Experimentation System for Engineering Education and Research

Published on: November 24, 2021

3.1K

Design of RTDA controller for industrial process using SOPDT model with minimum or non-minimum zero.

K Anbarasan1, K Srinivasan1

  • 1Department of Instrumentation and Control Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Tiruchirappalli 620 015, Tamilnadu, India.

ISA Transactions
|March 31, 2015
PubMed
Summary

This study presents simplified computational formulas for the Real-Time Dynamic Analysis (RTDA) control law, enhancing control performance for Second-Order Plus Dead Time (SOPDT) processes. The developed RTDA controller shows improved results compared to conventional methods on a non-linear CSTR process.

Keywords:
CSTR processDMC controllerMinimum or non-minimum phase zeroPID controllerRTDA controllerSOPDT processStability

More Related Videos

A Modeling and Simulation Method for Preliminary Design of an Electro-Variable Displacement Pump
09:04

A Modeling and Simulation Method for Preliminary Design of an Electro-Variable Displacement Pump

Published on: June 1, 2022

3.8K
Temperature-Controlled Assembly and Characterization of a Droplet Interface Bilayer
10:11

Temperature-Controlled Assembly and Characterization of a Droplet Interface Bilayer

Published on: April 19, 2021

4.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 15, 2026

Interactive and Visualized Online Experimentation System for Engineering Education and Research
08:35

Interactive and Visualized Online Experimentation System for Engineering Education and Research

Published on: November 24, 2021

3.1K
A Modeling and Simulation Method for Preliminary Design of an Electro-Variable Displacement Pump
09:04

A Modeling and Simulation Method for Preliminary Design of an Electro-Variable Displacement Pump

Published on: June 1, 2022

3.8K
Temperature-Controlled Assembly and Characterization of a Droplet Interface Bilayer
10:11

Temperature-Controlled Assembly and Characterization of a Droplet Interface Bilayer

Published on: April 19, 2021

4.3K

Area of Science:

  • Process Control
  • Control Engineering
  • Automation Systems

Background:

  • Second-Order Plus Dead Time (SOPDT) processes are common in industrial applications.
  • Existing control strategies may face challenges with non-minimum phase zeros.
  • Simplified control law computation is crucial for efficient implementation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop simplified Real-Time Dynamic Analysis (RTDA) control law computation formulae.
  • To address SOPDT processes with both minimum and non-minimum zeros.
  • To systematically design and evaluate the RTDA control scheme.

Main Methods:

  • Development of systematic computation for RTDA's three components: process output prediction, model prediction update, and control action computation.
  • Design and implementation of the RTDA controller.
  • Performance evaluation through simulation and comparison with IMC, SPC, MPC, and PID controllers.

Main Results:

  • A systematic approach for RTDA control law computation for SOPDT processes was successfully developed.
  • The RTDA controller demonstrated effective performance on a non-linear CSTR process.
  • Comparative analysis showed competitive or superior performance against IMC, SPC, MPC, and PID controllers.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed simplified RTDA control law computation formulae are effective for SOPDT processes.
  • The RTDA controller offers a viable and efficient alternative for industrial process control.
  • Further validation on diverse industrial processes is recommended.