Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 15, 2026
Author Spotlight: Advancing Endoscopic Ossiculoplasty – Techniques, Innovations, and Practical Guidance for Clinical Integration
Published on: January 26, 2024
Citation analysis of otorhinolaryngology journals: follow-up study
D H Coelho1, L W Edelmayer1, J E Fenton2
1Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery,Virginia Commonwealth University,Richmond,USA.
Objective:
This study aimed to evaluate the changes in impact factors of otorhinolaryngology journals over the past 15 years.
Method:
Using the online edition of Journal Citation Reports, standard (2-year) and 5-year impact factors were calculated for the leading 15 journals.
Results:
The results were compared with the impact factors for 1998. The average standard impact factor and 5-year impact factor increased by 2.72 and 2.05 fold respectively when compared with 1998. The average 2012 standard impact factor and 5-year impact factor were 1.82 and 1.99 respectively, reflecting a 9.3 per cent difference. The average 1998 standard impact factor and 5-year impact factor were 0.67 and 0.97 respectively, reflecting a 44.8 per cent difference. The Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology had the highest standard and five-year impact factors.
Conclusion:
These data may indicate changing clinical and research interests within our field, as well as increased speed and ease with which the internet has allowed citation. As a result, five-year intervals may no longer be necessary to adequately gauge journal impact.
