Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 15, 2026

Closure of a Patent Foramen Ovale PFO: An Intervention Sequence
Published on: December 23, 2022
Transfemoral and perventricular device occlusions and surgical repair for doubly committed subarterial ventricular
Chen Zhao Yang1, Cao Hua2, Ma Yuan Ji3
1Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Department of Cardiology, Union Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Insights
Perventricular device occlusion is a preferred, successful alternative to transfemoral occlusion for doubly committed subarterial ventricular septal defect (dcVSD). Surgical repair remains effective but involves longer recovery times compared to device occlusions.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Interventional Cardiology
- Pediatric Cardiology
Background:
- Doubly committed subarterial ventricular septal defect (dcVSD) management involves surgical repair or less invasive device occlusions via transfemoral or perventricular approaches.
- Comparative data on the efficacy and safety of these three dcVSD treatment modalities are limited.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the procedural success rates, clinical outcomes, and adverse events of transfemoral device occlusion, perventricular device occlusion, and conventional surgical repair for isolated dcVSD.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of inpatient data for patients with isolated dcVSD undergoing transfemoral or perventricular device occlusion or surgical repair between January 2009 and June 2013.
- Comparison of procedural success, hospitalization duration, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, operating room time, mechanical ventilation duration, transfusion rates, and adverse event profiles.
Main Results:
- Procedural success rates were 66% for transfemoral, 94.9% for perventricular, and 97.6% for surgical repair, with transfemoral occlusion being significantly less successful (p < 0.001).
- The surgical repair group experienced longer hospitalizations, ICU stays, operating times, and ventilation durations, along with higher transfusion rates (all p < 0.001).
- Adverse event rates were comparable across all three groups (p = 0.569), with no significant valvular regurgitation or atrioventricular block observed.
Conclusions:
- Device occlusion, particularly the perventricular approach, is a viable and effective alternative to surgical repair for selected patients with dcVSD, offering comparable safety.
- Perventricular occlusion demonstrates a superior success rate compared to the transfemoral approach for dcVSD closure.
Background:
Transfemoral and perventricular device occlusions are performed for doubly committed subarterial ventricular septal defect (dcVSD) to reduce the invasiveness of the conventional surgical repair through a median sternotomy. Few comparative studies have been conducted of these three procedures.
Methods:
Inpatients with isolated dcVSD who had undergone transfemoral and perventricular device occlusions or conventional surgical repair from January 2009 to June 2013 were reviewed to compare the three procedures.
Results:
Procedure success was achieved in 33 transfemoral (66%), in 74 perventricular (94.9%), and in 205 repair (97.6%) procedures. The transfemoral group had the lowest success rate (p < 0.001), whereas the perventricular and repair groups had similar success rates (p = 0.418). Transfemoral patients were the oldest (p < 0.001) and had a dcVSD size similar to that of patients in other two groups (p = 0.518). The repair group required the longest hospitalization and longest stays in the intensive care unit (p < 0.001), required the longest operating room and mechanical ventilation times (p < 0.001), and had the highest rate of transfusion (p < 0.001). Major adverse events occurred in one transfemoral (3%), in two perventricular (2.7%), and in three repair (1.4%) procedures. Minor adverse events were absent in transfemoral (0%) and occurred in three perventricular (4%) and 14 repair (6.7%) procedures. No significant difference was noted in the rates of adverse events the three groups (p = 0.569). No grade 3 valvular regurgitation or complete atrioventricular block was observed in the studied patients.
Conclusions:
Device occlusion may be an alternative to surgical repair in selected patients with dcVSD. Perventricular occlusion was the preferred approach because it showed a higher success rate than transfemoral occlusion.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction

