Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Increased work pace is unprofitable: a beef-cutting case study.

K Vogel1, J Karltun2, P H P Yeow3

  • 1KTH Royal Institute of Technology, STH, Unit of Ergonomics, Alfred Nobels allé 10, SE-141 52 Huddinge, Sweden.

Meat Science
|April 2, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Extending certified spectral fluorescence standards for the calibration and performance validation of fluorescence instruments to the NIR-closing the gap from 750 to 940 nm with two novel NIR dyes.

Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry·2025
Same author

Applying E/hf systems thinking to complex global problems.

Ergonomics·2024
Same author

Encouraging gender-inclusive acceptance of multipurpose national-identity smart cards.

PloS one·2022
Same author

Characterization of an ester-based core-multishell (CMS) nanocarrier for the topical application at the oral mucosa.

Clinical oral investigations·2021
Same author

[Pedicled vascularized iliac bone graft for treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head].

Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie·2020
Same author

Copepods drive large-scale trait-mediated effects in marine plankton.

Science advances·2019
Same journal

Enhanced reliability in subjective meat color data: A comparative study of Bayesian ordinal vs. frequentist metric methods.

Meat science·2026
Same journal

Interconnected oxidative and nitrosative reactions in fermented sausages during storage: Modulation by red barberry extract.

Meat science·2026
Same journal

Stable isotope and multi-element analysis coupled with DD-SIMCA for verification of Slovenian pork origin and Krškopolje pig authenticity.

Meat science·2026
Same journal

Establishing optimal lairage time for slaughter horses: welfare and meat quality aspects.

Meat science·2026
Same journal

A highly accurate framework for estimating eye muscle area and backfat thickness of pigs in vivo using deep learning.

Meat science·2026
Same journal

Improved quality profiles and decreased in vitro digestibility of frankfurters as influenced by synergistic effects of thermo-reversible/thermo-irreversible curdlan and transglutaminase.

Meat science·2026
See all related articles

Increasing beef cutting speed for profit is counterproductive. A faster pace significantly reduces meat yield, quality, and leads to economic losses, as confirmed by worker feedback and health concerns.

Area of Science:

  • Food Science
  • Agricultural Economics
  • Occupational Health

Background:

  • The global beef industry is increasingly prioritizing cutting speed for higher profits.
  • Previous studies on duck meat indicated that accelerated processing negatively impacts quality and yield.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the effects of different beef cutting paces on meat yield, quality, and economic outcomes.
  • To determine if the trend of increasing cutting pace in the beef industry is economically viable.

Main Methods:

  • A field experiment involving six workers processing beef fillet, sirloin, and entrecôte.
  • Three cutting paces were evaluated: Baseline (status quo), 'Quantity focus' (maximizing output), and 'Quality focus' (minimizing errors).
Keywords:
BeefEconomyHealthProductivityQualitySatisfaction

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The 'Quantity focus' pace led to a significant decrease in yield across all beef cuts.
  • An increased rate of quality deficiencies and economic losses were observed with the 'Quantity focus' pace.
  • Workers reported health issues associated with the accelerated cutting pace.

Conclusions:

  • Accelerated beef cutting paces, particularly those focused on quantity, are unprofitable.
  • Prioritizing cutting speed over quality and worker well-being results in detrimental economic and health consequences.