Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 15, 2026

07:37
Resurrection of Dormant Daphnia magna: Protocol and Applications
Published on: January 19, 2018
19.6K
Evolutionary stasis despite selection on a heritable trait in an invasive zooplankton
A L J Miehls1,2, S D Peacor1, L Valliant3
1Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
|April 3, 2015
Summary
Invasive zooplankton Bythotrephes longimanus show variable natural selection on spine length but little evolutionary response. Predation pressures drive selection, yet genetic factors and plasticity may limit adaptation.
Area of Science:
- Ecology
- Evolutionary Biology
- Invasive Species Research
Background:
- Invasive species pose significant ecological threats, with evolution influencing their success.
- Understanding natural selection and evolutionary adaptation in invasive animals is crucial but understudied.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantify natural selection on the defensive spine length of the invasive zooplankton Bythotrephes longimanus in Lake Michigan.
- To assess phenotypic changes in spine length since the species' invasion and identify evolutionary responses.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of distal spine length in wild-captured Bythotrephes longimanus over three growing seasons.
- Utilizing palaeoecological data from retrieved spines to reconstruct historical phenotypes.
- Quantifying natural selection by linking spine length to fitness proxies.
Main Results:
- Temporally variable selection was observed: selection for shorter spines early season and longer spines late season.
- This pattern aligns with seasonal shifts in fish predation (gape-limited vs. non-gape-limited).
- Despite strong selection and a genetic basis for spine length, a significant evolutionary response was not detected.
Conclusions:
- Natural selection on Bythotrephes longimanus spine length is dynamic and influenced by predator-prey interactions.
- Limited evolutionary response suggests constraints such as genetic correlations, fitness trade-offs, or phenotypic plasticity may be hindering adaptation.
Related Concept Videos
Speciation Rates
23.6K
Overview
23.6K
Genetic Drift
45.6K
Natural selection—probably the most well-known evolutionary mechanism—increases the prevalence of traits that enhance survival and reproduction. However, evolution does not merely propagate favorable traits, nor does it always benefit populations.
45.6K
Gene Flow
39.2K
Gene flow is the transfer of genes among populations, resulting from either the dispersal of gametes or from the migration of individuals.
39.2K
Limits to Natural Selection
36.2K
Organisms that are well-adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. However, natural selection does not lead to perfectly adapted organisms. Several factors constrain natural selection.
36.2K
Types of Selection
46.6K
Natural selection influences the frequencies of particular alleles and phenotypes within populations in several different ways. Primarily, natural selection can be directional, stabilizing, or disruptive. Directional selection favors one extreme trait and shifts the population towards that phenotype while selecting against individuals displaying alternate traits. Stabilizing selection favors an intermediate trait with a narrow range of variation. Deviation from the optimal phenotype towards an...
46.6K
Evolution of New Traits in Microbes
167
Microorganisms evolve rapidly due to their large population sizes and short generation times, often exhibiting measurable changes within days under laboratory conditions. Natural selection acts on standing genetic variation, enabling the retention and amplification of beneficial traits that confer fitness advantages in changing environments.Adaptive Pigment Regulation in RhodobacterIn Rhodobacter, a genus of purple non-sulfur bacteria, light-harvesting pigments such as bacteriochlorophyll and...
167

