Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Self-Report Tests of Personality01:22

Self-Report Tests of Personality

1.2K
Self-report inventories are objective personality assessments that use multiple-choice items or numbered scales, typically ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). They are often called Likert scales after Rensis Likert. These inventories are widely used due to their ease of administration and cost-effectiveness. One of the most prominent examples is the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), initially developed in the 1940s to assess abnormal personality traits.
1.2K
Levels of Use of a GIS01:29

Levels of Use of a GIS

471
Geographic Information Systems (GIS) operate across three levels of application, each representing an increasing degree of complexity: data management, analysis, and prediction. These levels reflect the expanding functionality and versatility of GIS technology in handling spatial data for diverse purposes.Data ManagementAt its foundational level, GIS serves as a tool for data management, enabling the input, storage, retrieval, and organization of spatial data. This level is often employed in...
471
Ordinal Level of Measurement00:55

Ordinal Level of Measurement

37.7K
The way a set of data is measured is called its level of measurement. Correct statistical procedures depend on a researcher being familiar with levels of measurement. For analysis, data are classified into four levels of measurement—nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio.
Data measured using an ordinal scale are similar to nominal scale data, but there is one major difference. The ordinal scale data can be ordered. An example of ordinal scale data is a list of the top five national parks...
37.7K
Measurement: Derived Units03:02

Measurement: Derived Units

57.7K
The International System of Units or SI system, by international agreement, has fixed measurement units for seven fundamental properties: length, mass, time, temperature, electric current, amount of substance, and luminosity. These are called the SI base units.
57.7K
Multi-input and Multi-variable systems01:22

Multi-input and Multi-variable systems

508
Cruise control systems in cars are designed as multi-input systems to maintain a driver's desired speed while compensating for external disturbances such as changes in terrain. The block diagram for a cruise control system typically includes two main inputs: the desired speed set by the driver and any external disturbances, such as the incline of the road. By adjusting the engine throttle, the system maintains the vehicle's speed as close to the desired value as possible.
In the absence of...
508
Measurement: Standard Units03:38

Measurement: Standard Units

86.4K
Every measurement provides three kinds of information: the size or magnitude of the measurement (a number), a standard of comparison for the measurement (a unit), and an indication of the uncertainty of the measurement. While the number and unit are explicitly represented when a quantity is written, the uncertainty is an aspect of the errors in the measurement results.
86.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Co-creation of services to maintain independence and optimise well-being: Learnings from Australia's Older Women Living Alone (OWLA) project.

Health & social care in the community·2019
Same author

Using co-creation and multi-criteria decision analysis to close service gaps for underserved populations.

Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy·2019
Same author

Correction to: Are Quality-Adjusted Life Years a Good Proxy Measure of Individual Capabilities?

PharmacoEconomics·2019
Same author

Economic evaluation of simulated and traditional clinical placements in occupational therapy education.

Australian occupational therapy journal·2019
Same author

Sharing and the Provision of "Cost-Ineffective" Life-Extending Services to Less Severely Ill Patients.

Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research·2018
Same author

Uncertainty and the Undervaluation of Services for Severe Health States in Cost-Utility Analyses.

Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research·2018

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 15, 2026

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

1.3K

Mapping between 6 Multiattribute Utility Instruments.

Gang Chen1, Munir A Khan2, Angelo Iezzi2

  • 1Flinders Health Economics Group, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia (GC, JR)

Medical Decision Making : an International Journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making
|April 5, 2015
PubMed
Summary

This study developed mapping functions to standardize multiattribute utility (MAU) instruments, improving health economic evaluation comparability. These crosswalks align measurement scales, enhancing confidence in quality-adjusted life year calculations across diverse studies.

Keywords:
cost-effectiveness analysiscost-utility analysishealth-related quality of lifemappingutility

More Related Videos

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.3K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

3.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 15, 2026

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

1.3K
Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.3K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

3.1K

Area of Science:

  • Health economics
  • Outcomes research
  • Psychometrics

Background:

  • Cost-utility analyses rely on multiattribute utility (MAU) instruments for health state utilities.
  • Discrepancies between MAU instruments hinder the comparison of economic evaluation studies.
  • Standardization is crucial for reliable quality-adjusted life year (QALY) calculations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and present 30 "crosswalk" mapping functions between six common MAU instruments.
  • To enable direct comparison of health state utilities estimated by different instruments.
  • To improve the consistency and comparability of cost-utility analyses.

Main Methods:

  • A multi-instrument comparison survey was conducted with 8022 respondents across 6 countries.
  • Six MAU instruments (EQ-5D-5L, SF-6D, HUI 3, 15D, QWB, AQoL-8D) were administered.
  • Mapping functions were estimated using ordinary least squares, generalized linear model, censored least absolute deviations, and MM-estimator techniques.

Main Results:

  • Goodness-of-fit indicators were comparable to published studies.
  • Developed transformations significantly reduced discrepancies between predicted health state utilities.
  • Incremental utilities aligned closely at sample means, indicating scale harmonization.

Conclusions:

  • The presented mapping functions effectively align the measurement scales of different MAU instruments.
  • Utilizing these crosswalks enhances confidence in comparing economic evaluation studies using various MAU tools.
  • This standardization facilitates more reliable QALY estimations and health policy decisions.