Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 15, 2026

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
Published on: October 11, 2018
Adaptive randomized phase II design for biomarker threshold selection and independent evaluation
Lindsay A Renfro1, Christina M Coughlin2, Axel M Grothey3
1Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. Renfro.lindsay@mayo.edu.
This study introduces an adaptive phase II trial design to prospectively identify and validate predictive biomarkers, improving patient selection and treatment efficacy. The adaptive design optimizes patient accrual and statistical power for personalized medicine.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Trial Design
- Biostatistics
- Pharmacogenomics
Background:
- Predictive biomarkers for experimental cancer therapies often lack validated thresholds at phase II trial initiation.
- Retrospective biomarker validation can lead to over-accrual of non-benefiting patients, resulting in underpowered studies and suboptimal care.
Purpose of the Study:
- Propose an adaptive randomized phase II study design for prospective biomarker threshold identification.
- Incorporate early futility stopping, mid-trial accrual restriction to marker-positive subjects, and final evaluation in the identified benefit population.
Main Methods:
- Utilize interim analysis to decide on trial continuation, futility stopping, or adaptive accrual based on biomarker promise.
- Perform final efficacy analyses in the target population identified at interim analysis.
- Conduct simulation studies to assess error rates, power, and sample size efficiency.
Main Results:
- The adaptive design effectively identifies predictive biomarkers and restricts accrual to patients most likely to benefit.
- Type I and II error rates are controlled through candidate threshold prevalence restriction and optimized interim analysis timing.
- Demonstrates favorable aspects including controlled error rates, adequate power, and reduced average sample size.
Conclusions:
- The proposed adaptive design offers a solution for identifying and validating continuous biomarkers within randomized phase II trials.
- Facilitates personalized medicine by ensuring experimental treatments are evaluated in the patient subgroups most likely to respond.
More Related Videos
07:40Preparation of Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cell Pellets and Plasma from a Single Blood Draw at Clinical Trial Sites for Biomarker Analysis
Published on: March 20, 2021
12:18A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
Published on: January 11, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs
Clinical Trials: Overview
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients