Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 15, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
Published on: September 16, 2022
The new pooled cohort equations risk calculator
David Preiss1, Søren L Kristensen2
1BHF Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Insights
The new ACC/AHA Pooled Cohort Equations calculator predicts atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk, including stroke and race for better accuracy. However, potential overestimation may lead to unnecessary statin prescriptions.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Preventive Medicine
- Health Risk Assessment
Background:
- Traditional cardiovascular risk assessment relied on Framingham scores.
- The 2013 American College of Cardiology (ACC) and American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines necessitated a new risk prediction tool.
- The ACC/AHA Pooled Cohort Equations Risk Calculator was developed to address these needs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the development of the ACC/AHA Pooled Cohort Equations Risk Calculator.
- To discuss the strengths and weaknesses of this new cardiovascular risk assessment tool.
- To explore the implications of its routine use in clinical practice.
Main Methods:
- The review analyzes the foundation of the ACC/AHA Pooled Cohort Equations, based on major National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute cohort studies.
- It examines the inclusion of specific endpoints like stroke and demographic factors such as race.
- The methodology also considers criticisms regarding potential risk overestimation.
Main Results:
- The calculator predicts 10-year risk of hard atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) events, including nonfatal myocardial infarction, fatal coronary heart disease, and stroke.
- Strengths include the incorporation of stroke as an endpoint and race as a characteristic, improving prediction for African-American individuals.
- It also provides lifetime ASCVD risk estimates for adults aged 20-59.
Conclusions:
- The ACC/AHA Pooled Cohort Equations offer advancements in cardiovascular risk prediction by including stroke and race.
- Omissions such as chronic kidney disease and social deprivation are notable weaknesses.
- Potential overestimation of ASCVD risk requires further validation to prevent overtreatment with statins.
Abstract:
In the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines published in 2001, estimation of cardiovascular risk was recommended based on the Framingham score for 10-year risk of myocardial infarction and the Canadian Cardiovascular Society currently recommends the Framingham total cardiovascular risk score. During development of joint guidelines released in 2013 by the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and American Heart Association (AHA), the decision was taken to develop a new risk score. This resulted in the ACC/AHA Pooled Cohort Equations Risk Calculator. This risk calculator, based on major National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-funded cohort studies, is designed to predict 10-year risk of 'hard' atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) events, namely, nonfatal myocardial infarction, fatal coronary heart disease, nonfatal, or fatal stroke. Considerable strengths are its inclusion of stroke as an end point and race as a characteristic, which allows better risk prediction especially in African-American individuals, plus provision of lifetime ASCVD risk estimates for adults aged 20-59 years. Notable omissions from the risk factors include chronic kidney disease and any measure of social deprivation. An early criticism of the Pooled Cohort Equations Risk Calculator has been its alleged overestimation of ASCVD risk which, if confirmed in the general population, is likely to result in statin therapy being prescribed to many individuals at lower risk than the intended 7.5% 10-year ASCVD risk threshold for treatment in the joint ACC/AHA cholesterol guidelines. In this review we discuss the development of the new risk calculator, its strengths and weaknesses, and potential implications for its routine use.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Relative Risk
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial...
Odds Ratio
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
Actuarial Approach
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...

