Related Experiment Videos
Summary scores captured changes in subjects' QoL as measured by the multiple scales of the EORTC QLQ-C30
Rachel Phillips1, Mihir Gandhi2, Yin Bun Cheung3
1Biostatistics Department, Singapore Clinical Research Institute, 31 Biopolis Way, Nanos #0201, Singapore 138669; Centre for Quantitative Medicine, Office of Clinical Sciences, Academia, 20 College Road, Singapore Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore.
Objectives:
To examine the performance of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) global health status/quality of life (QoL) scale and two summary scores to detect changes in the QoL profile over time, according to changes in the individual scales.
Study Design And Setting:
Data came from 167 clinical trial patients with unresectable (advanced) hepatocellular carcinoma. The global health status/QoL scale of the questionnaire contained two items: overall health and overall QoL. Nordin and Hinz proposed summary scores for the questionnaire. A mixed-effect model was fitted to estimate trends in scores over time.
Results:
Predominantly the individual scale scores declined over time; however, the global health status/QoL score was stable [rate of change = -0.3 per month; 95% confidence interval (CI): -1.2, 0.6]. Nordin's summary score, which gave equal weight to the 15 questionnaire scales, and Hinz's summary score, which gave equal weight to the 30 questionnaire items, showed a statistically significant decline over time, 3.4 (95% CI: -4.5, -2.4) and 4.2 (95% CI: -5.3, -3.0) points per month, respectively.
Conclusion:
In contrast to the global health status/QoL scale, the summary scores proposed by Nordin and Hinz detected changes in subjects' QoL profile described by the EORTC QLQ-C30 individual scales.
