Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 15, 2026

Bio-energetics Investigation of Candida albicans Using Real-time Extracellular Flux Analysis
Published on: March 19, 2019
Azole antifungals: 35 years of invasive fungal infection management
David Allen1, Dustin Wilson, Richard Drew
1Campbell University College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Buies Creek, NC, USA.
Abstract:
Prior to 1981, treatment options for invasive fungal infections were limited and associated with significant toxicities. The introduction of ketoconazole marked the beginning of an era of dramatic improvements over previous therapies for non-life-threatening mycosis. After nearly a decade of use, ketoconazole was quickly replaced by the triazoles fluconazole and itraconazole due to significant improvements in pharmacokinetic profile, spectrum of activity and safety. The triazoles posaconazole and voriconazole followed, and were better known for their further extended spectrum, specifically against emerging mold infections. With the exception of fluconazole, the triazoles have been plagued with significant inter- and intrapatient pharmacokinetic variability and all possess significant drug interactions. Azoles currently in development appear to combine an in vitro spectrum of activity comparable to voriconazole and posaconazole with more predictable pharmacokinetics and fewer adverse effects.
Insights
The development of azole antifungal drugs has evolved significantly, offering improved treatments for fungal infections with better safety and efficacy profiles over time. Newer azoles in development promise even more predictable pharmacokinetics and fewer side effects.
Area of Science:
- Medical Mycology
- Pharmacology
- Infectious Diseases
Background:
- Limited and toxic treatment options for invasive fungal infections existed before 1981.
- Ketoconazole represented an initial advancement, but was superseded by fluconazole and itraconazole due to improved properties.
- Subsequent triazoles like posaconazole and voriconazole expanded spectrum, particularly against molds.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the historical development and advancements in azole antifungal therapies.
- To highlight the pharmacokinetic and safety challenges associated with existing triazoles.
- To introduce emerging azole agents with improved therapeutic potential.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of antifungal drug development.
- Comparative analysis of azole antifungal agents based on spectrum, pharmacokinetics, and safety.
- Discussion of current trends and future directions in azole antifungal research.
Main Results:
- Ketoconazole offered initial improvements but had limitations.
- Fluconazole, itraconazole, posaconazole, and voriconazole demonstrated progressive enhancements in spectrum and efficacy.
- Existing triazoles exhibit significant pharmacokinetic variability and drug interactions, except for fluconazole.
Conclusions:
- The evolution of azoles has led to more effective treatments for fungal infections.
- Pharmacokinetic variability and drug interactions remain challenges for current triazoles.
- Next-generation azoles are expected to offer superior pharmacokinetic profiles and safety, building upon the efficacy of existing agents.
Related Concept Videos
Antifungal Agents
Endocarditis III: Medical Management
Fungal Phylum Microsporidia
Fungal Group Zygomycota
Endocarditis IV: Nursing Management
Inflammatory Bowel Disease IV: Pharmacological Management
Pharmacologic...

