Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Standard Deviation01:10

Standard Deviation

29.4K
The most commonly used measure of variation is the standard deviation. It is a numerical value measuring how far data values are from their mean. The standard deviation value is small when the data are concentrated close to the mean, exhibiting slight variation or spread. The standard deviation value is never negative, it is either positive or zero. The standard deviation is larger when the data values are more spread out from the mean, which means the data values are exhibiting more variation.
29.4K
Types of Selection01:46

Types of Selection

46.6K
Natural selection influences the frequencies of particular alleles and phenotypes within populations in several different ways. Primarily, natural selection can be directional, stabilizing, or disruptive. Directional selection favors one extreme trait and shifts the population towards that phenotype while selecting against individuals displaying alternate traits. Stabilizing selection favors an intermediate trait with a narrow range of variation. Deviation from the optimal phenotype towards an...
46.6K
Social Facilitation01:04

Social Facilitation

36.9K
Not all intergroup interactions lead to negative outcomes. Sometimes, being in a group situation can improve performance. Social facilitation occurs when an individual performs better when an audience is watching than when the individual performs the behavior alone. This typically occurs when people are performing a task for which they are skilled.
36.9K
Distribution and Dispersion00:54

Distribution and Dispersion

26.1K
To understand intra-specific interactions in populations, scientists measure the spatial arrangement of species individuals. This geographic arrangement is known as the species distribution or dispersion. Highly territorial species exhibit a uniform distribution pattern, in which individuals are spaced at relatively equal distances from one another. Species that are highly tied to particular resources, such as food or shelter, tend to concentrate around those resources, and thus exhibit a...
26.1K
The Representativeness Heuristic02:13

The Representativeness Heuristic

17.1K
The representative heuristic describes a biased way of thinking, in which you unintentionally stereotype someone or something. For example, you may assume that your professors spend their free time reading books and engaging in intellectual conversation, because the idea of them spending their time playing volleyball or visiting an amusement park does not fit in with your stereotypes of professors.
17.1K
Social Loafing01:37

Social Loafing

40.0K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
40.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) after resection of brain metastases: results of the multicenter SUBAROMA study.

Journal of neuro-oncology·2026
Same author

An information intervention in India reduces consumption of arsenic-contaminated drinking water and has small effects on health.

PNAS nexus·2026
Same author

Self-Help Plus for refugee mothers in Rhino Refugee Settlement, Uganda (SEED): study protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled trial assessing intergenerational effects on preschool-aged children.

Trials·2026
Same author

Concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide for 1p/19q non-co-deleted anaplastic glioma (CATNON; EORTC study 26053-22054): final and exploratory analyses of a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.

The Lancet. Oncology·2025
Same author

Comparative evaluation of normal tissue objective functions in robotic radiosurgery planning for solitary brain tumors.

Journal of applied clinical medical physics·2025
Same author

Combining mental health and climate-smart agricultural interventions to improve food security in humanitarian settings: study protocol for the THRIVE cluster-randomized controlled trial with mothers in Nakivale refugee settlement, Uganda.

Trials·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 15, 2026

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task
06:08

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

1.2K

Revealed distributional preferences: Individuals vs. teams.

Loukas Balafoutas1, Rudolf Kerschbamer1, Martin Kocher2

  • 1University of Innsbruck, Austria.

Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization
|April 7, 2015
PubMed
Summary

Teams show greater benevolence than individuals when facing disadvantageous inequality. This research explores how group dynamics influence fairness and efficiency preferences in economic decision-making.

Keywords:
Behavioral economicsDistributional preferencesExperimental economicsIndividual decisionsSocial preferencesStability of preferencesTeam decisions

More Related Videos

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

2.7K
Methods for Presenting Real-world Objects Under Controlled Laboratory Conditions
06:54

Methods for Presenting Real-world Objects Under Controlled Laboratory Conditions

Published on: June 21, 2019

6.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 15, 2026

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task
06:08

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

1.2K
The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

2.7K
Methods for Presenting Real-world Objects Under Controlled Laboratory Conditions
06:54

Methods for Presenting Real-world Objects Under Controlled Laboratory Conditions

Published on: June 21, 2019

6.4K

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral Economics
  • Social Psychology
  • Decision Sciences

Background:

  • Understanding distributional preferences is crucial for designing fair economic systems.
  • Previous research has primarily focused on individual decision-making, with less attention paid to group dynamics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To experimentally compare the distributional preferences of individuals and teams.
  • To investigate how group composition affects fairness and efficiency considerations in resource allocation tasks.

Main Methods:

  • Experimental economics design involving allocation tasks.
  • Comparison of decision-making outcomes between individual participants and small teams.
  • Analysis of revealed preference types based on allocation choices.

Main Results:

  • Teams exhibit significantly higher benevolence than individuals when dealing with disadvantageous inequality.
  • Benevolence levels in advantageous inequality scenarios are comparable between individuals and teams.
  • Inequality aversion is prevalent in individuals but absent in teams; spiteful types are more common in individuals.
  • Efficiency-loving preferences are markedly more frequent in teams compared to individuals.

Conclusions:

  • Group decision-making processes alter distributional preferences, leading to increased benevolence in specific contexts.
  • The shift in preference types from individuals to teams has significant implications for understanding social and economic behaviors.
  • Findings highlight the importance of considering group dynamics in theories of fairness and economic behavior.