Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Reproducibility of patch tests.

R Gollhausen1, B Przybilla, J Ring

  • 1Dermatologische Klinik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Federal Republic of Germany.

Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
|December 1, 1989
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Atopy patch testing with aeroallergens in a large clinical population of dermatitis patients in Germany and Switzerland, 2000-2015: a retrospective multicentre study.

Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV·2020
Same author

Food-induced anaphylaxis and cofactors - data from the anaphylaxis registry.

Allergologie select·2018
Same author

Risk factors in Hymenoptera venom allergy.

Allergologie select·2018
Same author

Overcoming severe adverse reactions to venom immunotherapy using anti-IgE antibodies in combination with a high maintenance dose.

Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology·2017
Same author

Meat allergy associated with galactosyl-α-(1,3)-galactose (α-Gal)-Closing diagnostic gaps by anti-α-Gal IgE immune profiling.

Allergy·2017
Same author

Effects of a structured educational intervention on knowledge and emergency management in patients at risk for anaphylaxis.

Allergy·2014
Same journal

Comparative Alopecia Outcomes After Copper and Hormonal Intrauterine Device Placement: A TriNetX Database Retrospective Cohort Study.

Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology·2026
Same journal

Uncovering a Dual Th17/Type 2 Transcriptomic Endotype in Psoriasis.

Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology·2026
Same journal

Dermatologic conditions associated with HIV among US adults across different racial and ethnic groups: A retrospective cohort study using TriNetX.

Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology·2026
Same journal

Ethical Considerations in Same-Day Surgical Treatment of a High-Risk, Poorly Differentiated Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology·2026
Same journal

The Ethics of the Handshake in Dermatology.

Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology·2026
Same journal

Dermatology images: Hidradenitis suppurativa.

Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology·2026
See all related articles

Patch testing reproducibility is low, with 40-43% of positive reactions being nonreproducible. Weak reactions are less reliable than strong ones in allergy testing.

Area of Science:

  • Dermatology
  • Allergy and immunology

Background:

  • Patch testing is a standard diagnostic tool for allergic contact dermatitis.
  • Reproducibility of patch test results is crucial for accurate diagnosis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the reproducibility of patch test results.
  • To determine the impact of testing methodology on reproducibility.

Main Methods:

  • Patch tests with 39 substances were applied to 41 patients.
  • Sequential testing was performed on one side, repeated a week later on the contralateral side.
  • Concomitant testing involved simultaneous application of duplicate series on both sides.

Main Results:

  • 40.0% of positive reactions were nonreproducible in sequential testing.

Related Experiment Videos

  • 43.8% of positive reactions were nonreproducible in concomitant testing.
  • Weakly positive reactions showed significantly lower reproducibility than stronger reactions.

    • Conclusions:

    • Patch test results exhibit considerable variability.
    • Testing methodology and reaction strength influence reproducibility.
    • Clinical interpretation should consider the potential for nonreproducible results, especially for weak reactions.