Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 15, 2026

A Modified Sonographic Algorithm for Image Acquisition in Life-Threatening Emergencies in the Critically Ill Newborn
Published on: April 7, 2023
Prehospital care and transportation of pediatric trauma patients
Casey J Allen1, Laura F Teisch1, Jonathan P Meizoso1
1Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Dewitt-Daughtry Family Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.
Insights
Prehospital interventions (PHIs) in pediatric trauma patients do not delay transport or worsen outcomes. Critically injured children requiring PHIs arrived at the hospital without increased delays, demonstrating safe and effective prehospital care.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Emergency Medicine
- Trauma Care
- Prehospital Services
Background:
- Current prehospital emergency medical services (EMS) often favor rapid transport over on-scene interventions.
- Limited research exists on the impact of prehospital interventions (PHIs) in pediatric trauma.
- This study investigates if PHIs delay transport and affect outcomes in critically injured children.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine if prehospital interventions (PHIs) delay transportation for pediatric trauma patients.
- To assess whether PHIs worsen outcomes in pediatric trauma cases.
- To evaluate the hypothesis that interventions delay transport and negatively impact outcomes in mortally injured children.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 1884 pediatric trauma admissions (≤17 years) transported by EMS.
- Propensity score matching to compare outcomes between patients requiring PHIs (intubation, resuscitation) and those who did not.
- Analysis of transportation times, on-scene times, length of stay, and mortality rates.
Main Results:
- Patients requiring PHIs had similar transportation times to those not receiving interventions.
- Injury severity measures were generally worse in patients requiring PHIs.
- After adjusting for confounding factors, no significant differences in on-scene time, hospital arrival time, length of stay, or mortality were observed between matched PHI and non-PHI cohorts.
Conclusions:
- Prehospital interventions (PHIs) do not appear to delay transportation for pediatric trauma patients.
- The performance of PHIs in the prehospital setting does not worsen outcomes in pediatric trauma.
- Critically injured children requiring PHIs arrived at the trauma center without increased delays, supporting their use when indicated.
Background:
Despite advances in prehospital emergency medical services (EMS), most advocate "scoop-and-run" over "stay-and-play." However, there are almost no studies in children. We hypothesize that the transportation of mortally injured children is delayed and that the performance of prehospital interventions (PHIs) themselves delay transportation and worsen outcomes in pediatric trauma patients.
Materials And Methods:
A total of 1884 admissions (≤17-y-old) transported via EMS to a level 1 trauma center from January 2000-December 2012 were reviewed. Propensity scores were assigned based on the need for a PHI (intubation and resuscitation). PHI and non-PHI cohorts were matched 1:1 to compare outcomes. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation or median (interquartile range).
Results:
The population was 11 ± 6 y, 70% male, 50% black, 76% blunt injury, injury severity score 13 ± 12, length of stay 3 (7) d, and mortality 3.6%. Incident to EMS arrival was 38 (20) min, EMS on-scene time was 14 (12) min, and overall time of arrival to hospital was 27 (15) min. Patients that were mortally wounded, despite having significantly higher rates of PHI, still had similar transportation times to those who survived. Mostly every measure of injury severity was worse in those who required PHI. When these factors were corrected, EMS on-scene time was 18 (13) versus 14 (13) min (P = 0.551), EMS arrival at the hospital was 31 (16) versus 28 (12) min (P = 0.292), length of stay was 5 (15) versus 4 (12) d (P = 0.368), and mortality was 31.7% versus 28.3% (P = 0.842) for PHI and non-PHI matched cohorts.
Conclusions:
PHIs did not delay transportation times or worsen outcomes in pediatric trauma patients. Although mortally injured children more often required PHIs, this did not delay transportation to the trauma center.
Related Concept Videos
Specialized Care Centers and Settings-II
Rural health centers are specialized care facilities in remote locations with very few medical personnel. The primary care providers who run the centers are mostly Registered Nurse Practitioners. Here, emergency treatment is provided to critically ill or injured patients before they are transferred to the closest hospital. Fortunately, due to advancement in technology, many rural healthcare facilities and professionals have easy access to diagnostic and treatment...
Flail Chest-II
Assessment:
1. Clinical Evaluation:
History:
Hospitals-I
Cardiomyopathy VII: Pre and Post Operative Nursing Management
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation II: ACLS Airway Management
Acute Kidney Injury V: Interprofessional Care

