Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Modulation of Orthodontic Tooth Movement by Statins: A Systematic Review of Animal Studies.

Dentistry journal·2026
Same author

Clinical performance of 3D printed porous titanium dental implants supporting single crowns: A 2-year retrospective study.

Journal of dentistry·2026
Same author

Three-year clinical outcomes of additively manufactured hybrid composite implant-supported restorations fabricated through tilting stereolithography: a retrospective clinical study.

Journal of dentistry·2026
Same author

Effects of microplastic release from 3D-printed orthodontic aligners: a histological and immunological bioassay approach.

European journal of orthodontics·2026
Same author

Reconstruction of Surgical Defects From Early Carcinoma of Tongue Supported by Cross-Linked Hyaluronic Acid.

The Journal of craniofacial surgery·2026
Same author

A Case Series on the Combined Use of Zinc L-Carnosine and Nd:YAG Photobiomodulation for Radiation-Induced Oral Mucositis: Pain Reduction and Lesion Improvement.

Case reports in dentistry·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 15, 2026

Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment
07:32

Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment

Published on: February 23, 2024

2.1K

Predictive variables derived from panoramic radiographs for impacted maxillary cuspids treated with easy cuspid

Alberto Caprioglio1, Francesca Finazzi, Carmen Mortellaro

  • 1*Dental School, Department of Surgical and Morphological Science, University of Varese, Varese †Department of Health Sciences ‡Oral Surgery Unit, "A. Avogadro" University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy.

The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
|April 9, 2015
PubMed
Summary

This study investigated predicting orthodontic traction duration for impacted maxillary cuspids using panoramic radiographs. Pretreatment radiographic features did not significantly predict traction time, indicating current methods may not apply to all techniques.

More Related Videos

A Finite Element Approach for Locating the Center of Resistance of Maxillary Teeth
10:50

A Finite Element Approach for Locating the Center of Resistance of Maxillary Teeth

Published on: April 8, 2020

10.4K
Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization
05:49

Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization

Published on: February 23, 2024

1.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 15, 2026

Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment
07:32

Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment

Published on: February 23, 2024

2.1K
A Finite Element Approach for Locating the Center of Resistance of Maxillary Teeth
10:50

A Finite Element Approach for Locating the Center of Resistance of Maxillary Teeth

Published on: April 8, 2020

10.4K
Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization
05:49

Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization

Published on: February 23, 2024

1.7K

Area of Science:

  • Dentistry
  • Orthodontics
  • Radiology

Background:

  • Impacted maxillary cuspids are a common orthodontic challenge.
  • Predicting treatment duration is crucial for patient management and planning.
  • Existing methods for predicting traction time may not be universally applicable.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify a statistical method using panoramic radiographs to forecast the duration of orthodontic traction for palatally impacted maxillary cuspids.
  • To evaluate the correlation between pretreatment radiographic indicators and traction time.
  • To assess the applicability of established prediction formulas to a specific treatment protocol.

Main Methods:

  • A sample of 51 palatal impacted cuspids in 35 patients (aged 10.5-17.5 years, cervical vertebral maturation stages 1-4) was analyzed.
  • Panoramic radiographs and cephalograms were used to derive eight radiographic indicators.
  • Multiple regression analysis was employed to assess correlations between radiographic features and traction duration.
  • Patients were treated with a combined surgical-orthodontic technique (Easy Cuspid method).

Main Results:

  • All impacted cuspids were successfully treated with an average traction time of 99 days.
  • Pretreatment radiographic features from panoramic films did not significantly influence traction duration.
  • A derived formula (based on α angle, d1 distance, S sector) overestimated the average traction time (123 days).
  • No significant correlations were found between traction time and pretreatment radiographic parameters.

Conclusions:

  • Pretreatment radiographic indicators assessed on panoramic films are not reliable predictors of orthodontic traction duration for palatally impacted maxillary cuspids treated with the Easy Cuspid method.
  • Established prediction formulas may not be suitable for all orthodontic treatment approaches.
  • Further research is needed to develop accurate predictive models for orthodontic traction duration in impacted teeth.