Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

113.9K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
113.9K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

16.2K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
16.2K
Accuracy and Precision01:52

Accuracy and Precision

17.7K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.  Highly accurate...
17.7K
The Scientific Method03:50

The Scientific Method

72.4K
Chemistry is an empirical science. Scientists often pose questions to understand the chemistry in everyday life and seek answers to these questions. To achieve this, scientists follow a definitive series of steps that together make up the Scientific Method. This approach involves making observations, asking questions, building a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing results, and forming a conclusion. 
72.4K
The Scientific Method01:32

The Scientific Method

275.8K
The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
275.8K
The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

67.4K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
67.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

MAPK-activated protein kinase 2 orchestrates memory T-cell inflation in cytomegalovirus infection.

Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950)·2026
Same author

IDH1-R132H enhances oncolytic HSV-1 therapy by facilitating viral entry and immune activation in glioma.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

A Legacy of Mentorship: A Tribute to Lewis Cantley.

Cancer discovery·2026
Same author

MAPKAP Kinase 2 Orchestrates Memory T Cell Inflation in Cytomegalovirus Infection.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

A simple circuit to sustain intact tumor microenvironments for complex drug interrogations.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

A rebrand for proteasome inhibition in solid tumors via continuous hepatic artery infusion.

JCI insight·2025
Same journal

ZNRF3 and RNF43 are active monomeric E3 ubiquitin ligases that self-associate.

Science signaling·2026
Same journal

Allosteric ligands with distinct properties uncover tissue-specific physiological regulation mediated by free fatty acid receptor 2.

Science signaling·2026
Same journal

Diacylglycerol kinase ζ in B lymphocytes supports CD40-mediated immune synapse formation, mTORC1 signaling, and plasma cell fate.

Science signaling·2026
Same journal

The APC/C adaptor Cdh1 stabilizes STING to potentiate innate immune activation in renal cell carcinoma.

Science signaling·2026
Same journal

Fattening mother's milk with oxytocin.

Science signaling·2026
Same journal

Virion display reveals MD-1 as an endogenous agonist for the orphan receptor GPRC5B.

Science signaling·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 15, 2026

Author Spotlight: Biological Standardization to Ensure Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research
04:50

Author Spotlight: Biological Standardization to Ensure Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research

Published on: August 4, 2023

1.8K

Reproducibility in science.

Michael B Yaffe1

  • 1Michael B. Yaffe is the Chief Scientific Editor of Science Signaling, American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1200 New York Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20005, USA, and Professor at David H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, The Broad Institute, and the Departments of Biology and Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.

Science Signaling
|April 9, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Scientific reproducibility is a growing concern, with many studies failing to replicate. This unreliability stems from both technical challenges and the high-pressure research environment.

More Related Videos

An Open Source Technology Platform to Manufacture Hydrogel-Based 3D Culture Models in an Automated and Standardized Fashion
08:29

An Open Source Technology Platform to Manufacture Hydrogel-Based 3D Culture Models in an Automated and Standardized Fashion

Published on: March 31, 2022

5.0K
Environmentally Induced Heritable Changes in Flax
08:10

Environmentally Induced Heritable Changes in Flax

Published on: January 26, 2011

10.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 15, 2026

Author Spotlight: Biological Standardization to Ensure Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research
04:50

Author Spotlight: Biological Standardization to Ensure Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research

Published on: August 4, 2023

1.8K
An Open Source Technology Platform to Manufacture Hydrogel-Based 3D Culture Models in an Automated and Standardized Fashion
08:29

An Open Source Technology Platform to Manufacture Hydrogel-Based 3D Culture Models in an Automated and Standardized Fashion

Published on: March 31, 2022

5.0K
Environmentally Induced Heritable Changes in Flax
08:10

Environmentally Induced Heritable Changes in Flax

Published on: January 26, 2011

10.7K

Area of Science:

  • Scientific methodology
  • Research integrity

Background:

  • The scientific community faces challenges with reproducibility and reliability.
  • High-profile studies have recently failed to be reproduced.

Discussion:

  • Errors in reliability can arise from the application of new techniques with unknown limitations.
  • The intense pressure for research funding and publication contributes to reproducibility problems.

Key Insights:

  • Reproducibility crisis in science.
  • Impact of research pressure on scientific reliability.
  • Challenges in scientific validation.

Outlook:

  • Need for improved scientific standards.
  • Addressing systemic issues in research culture.
  • Enhancing the trustworthiness of scientific findings.