Adding fentanyl to etomidate fails to reduce painful recall of external direct current cardioversion in adults: a randomised trial
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 15, 2026

Electrode Positioning and Montage in Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
Published on: May 23, 2011
Xenia Souvatzis1, Marina Kalogridaki, Hercules E Mavrakis
1Department of Anaesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Crete, Greece.
Introduction:
External electrical cardioversion under hypnotics, even when combined with opioids, has been consistently described as distressing or painful. The main objective of the present study was to determine if adding an opioid to a hypnotic, in comparison to the same hypnotic alone, would decrease the incidence of unpleasant or painful recall during anaesthesia for external electrical cardioversion.
Methods:
This was a single-centre, prospective, randomised, double-blinded clinical trial that took place from September 2011 to March 2012. Fifty-two adult patients with persistent atrial fibrillation, scheduled for external direct current cardioversion, were enrolled. Exclusion criteria were age >80 years, previous cardiac surgery, implanted pacemaker or defibrillator, and haemodynamic instability. Patients received intravenously either (group EF) fentanyl 50 g and after 60 s etomidate 0.1 mg/kg, or (group E) only etomidate 0.1 mg/kg. If the patients did not lose their eyelid reflex, repeated doses of etomidate 4 mg were given. Cardioversion was attempted with an extracardiac biphasic electrical shock from 200 to 300 J, at most three times. The primary endpoint was recall of something unpleasant or painful. Secondary outcome measures were predictors of the requirement for repeat doses of etomidate, and the number of shocks needed.
Results:
Fifty-one patients (35 male, 16 female), aged 62.1 ± 10.2 years, completed the study. There were no differences between group EF and group E regarding recall (unpleasant recall 0 vs. 2 patients, p=0.235; painful recall 1 vs. 0 patients, p=0.510). The administration of etomidate alone was a significant predictor for subsequent repeated doses of etomidate (p=0.049, odds ratio 4.312, 95% confidence interval 1.007-18.460). The number of shocks needed to restore sinus rhythm did not differ between the groups (p=0.846).
Conclusions:
In the present study, the addition of fentanyl to etomidate did not diminish distressing or painful experience during anaesthesia for external cardioversion.
More Related Videos
03:49Author Spotlight: Optimizing EAS with Long Electrodes for Enhanced Cochlear Coverage and Hearing Preservation
Published on: October 11, 2024
05:39Author Spotlight: A Non-Intubated Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery with Multimodal Analgesia and Sevoflurane Inhalation Anesthesia
Published on: May 26, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Parenteral Anesthetics: Overview
Local Anesthetics: Adverse Effects
Once absorbed into the systemic circulation, local anesthetics can affect the organs that depend on the functioning of sodium...
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Epidural Anesthesia
Since epidural anesthetics can be infused through an epidural catheter, all types of drugs, including short-acting ones, can be administered. Chloroprocaine and lidocaine are examples of short and long-duration anesthetics, respectively. Bupivacaine...
ECG Interpretation of Arrhythmias II: Atrial, Junctional and Ventricular Arrhythmias
Opioid Analgesics: Synthetic and Semisynthetic Opioids