Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

26.3K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
26.3K
The Scientific Method01:32

The Scientific Method

275.8K
The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
275.8K
The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

67.4K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
67.4K
The Scientific Method03:50

The Scientific Method

72.4K
Chemistry is an empirical science. Scientists often pose questions to understand the chemistry in everyday life and seek answers to these questions. To achieve this, scientists follow a definitive series of steps that together make up the Scientific Method. This approach involves making observations, asking questions, building a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing results, and forming a conclusion. 
72.4K
Scientific Laws and Theories02:31

Scientific Laws and Theories

92.0K
Scientific Laws
92.0K
Psychology as a Science01:13

Psychology as a Science

4.3K
Psychology, as a scientific discipline, aims to understand the mind and behavior through rigorous and systematic methods. The foundation of psychological research is evidence-based, relying heavily on the scientific method to derive and validate knowledge. This structured approach ensures that findings are reliable, valid, and applicable to broader contexts.
The scientific method in psychology involves six critical steps: making observations, formulating hypotheses, conducting tests, analyzing...
4.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[When ideology undermines science: the consequences of gender identity exclusion in transgender population health research].

Epidemiologia e prevenzione·2025
Same author

[Drugs, sex and gender].

Epidemiologia e prevenzione·2024
Same author

Recommendations for the Application of Sex and Gender Medicine in Preclinical, Epidemiological and Clinical Research.

Journal of personalized medicine·2024
Same author

[Wind days in Taranto (Southern Italy): a public health intervention between technical and social contradictions. Lessons learned].

Epidemiologia e prevenzione·2024
Same author

Cardiorespiratory diseases in an industrialized area: a retrospective population-based cohort study.

BMC public health·2023
Same author

[SENTIERI Reports and the national priority contaminated site of Brindisi (Apulia Region, Southern Italy)].

Epidemiologia e prevenzione·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 15, 2026

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research
07:48

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research

Published on: November 26, 2015

10.4K

[A Parliament debate regarding a scientific study].

Marco Cervino1, Cristina Mangia, Emilio Antonio Luca Gianicolo

  • 1Istituto di scienze dell'atmosfera e del clima, Consiglio nazionale delle ricerche, Bologna. m.cervino@isac.cnr.it.

Epidemiologia E Prevenzione
|April 10, 2015
PubMed
Summary

This study examines the link between maternal exposure to air pollution and congenital anomalies. It questions the reliability of exposure data and whether health risks exist below legal limits.

More Related Videos

Studying Cavitation Enhanced Therapy
07:36

Studying Cavitation Enhanced Therapy

Published on: April 9, 2021

6.0K
Author Spotlight: Training of Laboratory Animals for Gentle and Stress-Free Handling
05:21

Author Spotlight: Training of Laboratory Animals for Gentle and Stress-Free Handling

Published on: February 16, 2024

4.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 15, 2026

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research
07:48

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research

Published on: November 26, 2015

10.4K
Studying Cavitation Enhanced Therapy
07:36

Studying Cavitation Enhanced Therapy

Published on: April 9, 2021

6.0K
Author Spotlight: Training of Laboratory Animals for Gentle and Stress-Free Handling
05:21

Author Spotlight: Training of Laboratory Animals for Gentle and Stress-Free Handling

Published on: February 16, 2024

4.2K

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Health
  • Epidemiology
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Studies linking pollution and health outcomes generate significant public and institutional interest.
  • A recent paper in Environmental Research investigated congenital anomalies and maternal exposure to atmospheric pollutants in Brindisi, Italy.
  • This commentary addresses public and institutional reactions to such findings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address key questions arising from a parliamentary debate on environmental health research.
  • To discuss the certification of data used in exposure estimations.
  • To evaluate the potential for adverse health effects at pollutant levels below legal limits.

Main Methods:

  • Commentary based on a specific scientific paper and a parliamentary debate.
  • Discussion of data quality and institutional certification for exposure assessments.
  • Analysis of health risks associated with pollutant exposure below regulatory thresholds.

Main Results:

  • The commentary highlights the need for certified data in exposure assessments.
  • It suggests that adverse health effects cannot be excluded even at pollutant levels below legal limits.
  • It emphasizes the importance of public health protection measures.

Conclusions:

  • Research on pollution and health necessitates robust, institutionally certified data.
  • Vigilance is required for potential health risks below current legal exposure limits.
  • Collaboration between researchers and public administrations is crucial for effective public health policy.