Related Experiment Videos
Medical malpractice experience of physicians. Predictable or haphazard?
F A Sloan1, P M Mergenhagen, W B Burfield
1Health Policy Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235.
Abstract:
This study uses a large malpractice database from Florida to assess the concentration of losses among physicians, predictability of claims experience, characteristics of physicians with favorable vs unfavorable experience, and effects of claims experience on physicians' practice decisions and on actions taken by the state's licensing board. Most payments by insurers involved a comparatively small number of physicians. Physicians with relatively prestigious credentials had no better, and on some indicators, worse claims experience. If anything, physicians with adverse claims experience were less likely to make subsequent changes in their practice, such as quitting practice or moving to another state. Physicians with very poor claims histories were more likely to have complaints filed against them with the Florida licensing board, but the sanctions against physicians with either poor or excellent histories were not severe. Physicians with adverse claims experience from incidents that arose between 1975 and 1980 had appreciably worse claims experience from incidents that arose during 1981 to 1983.
Insights
A small group of physicians account for most malpractice payouts, and adverse claims experience doesn't deter practice changes. Physicians with poor malpractice histories face mild sanctions and may experience recurring claims.
Area of Science:
- Medical malpractice research
- Physician performance analysis
- Healthcare policy
Background:
- Malpractice claims data is crucial for understanding physician accountability.
- Assessing physician claims experience informs risk management and regulatory actions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze malpractice loss concentration among physicians.
- To determine the predictability and characteristics of physician claims experience.
- To evaluate the impact of claims history on practice decisions and licensing board actions.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a large malpractice claims database from Florida.
- Analyzed physician characteristics, claims history, and practice changes.
- Examined licensing board complaints and sanctions.
Main Results:
- A small subset of physicians accounted for the majority of malpractice payments.
- Physician prestige did not correlate with better claims experience; some indicators showed worse outcomes for prestigious physicians.
- Adverse claims experience was linked to a higher likelihood of subsequent complaints but not significant practice alterations (e.g., quitting practice).
- Sanctions imposed by the licensing board were not severe for physicians with poor or excellent claims histories.
- Physicians with adverse claims between 1975-1980 experienced worse outcomes in 1981-1983.
Conclusions:
- Malpractice losses are highly concentrated among a few physicians.
- Physician claims history has limited impact on practice behavior and regulatory sanctions.
- Past malpractice incidents predict future claims, suggesting a need for targeted interventions.