Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 15, 2026
Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material
Published on: December 20, 2024
Damage tolerance of indirect restorative materials (including PICN) after simulated bur adjustments
Andrea Coldea1, Jens Fischer2, Michael V Swain3
1Research and Development Department, VITA Zahnfabrik, Ballyweg 6, 79713 Bad Saeckingen, Germany; Department of Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, University of Otago, PO Box 647, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Objective:
To analyze the damage tolerance of indirect restorative materials after grinding with diamond burs to simulate adjustments by clinicians and technicians.
Methods:
Seven commercially available restorative materials (Mark II, ENAMIC, In-Ceram Alumina, VM 9, In-Ceram YZ, IPS e.max CAD) and an experimental one (PICN) were analyzed. Forty bending bars per material were fabricated according to manufacturer's instructions and lapped with 15 μm diamond suspension. The initial flexural strength was determined in three-point-bending on 10 specimens. Additionally the elastic modulus and Poisson's ratio were determined by the resonant frequency method. The remaining bending bars were divided into six groups (n=5) and subjected to standardized grinding with three different diamond grit burs (coarse, 151 μm; medium, 107 μm and extra fine 25 μm) and two grinding directions (transversal and longitudinal). The ground specimens were subsequently loaded to fracture and analyzed by SEM.
Results:
Except for the YTZP bending bars, the initial materials strength of all tested materials decreased significantly with all diamond burs upon adjustments in both transversal and longitudinal grinding directions. The resistance of the ground materials to strength reduction follow the order from highest to least damage tolerant material: PICN>ENAMIC>Mark II>VM 9>In-Ceram Alumina>IPS e.max CAD. The loss in strength of all examined materials after longitudinal grinding is generally less compared to transversal grinding. The lowest loss in strength occurred for VM 9 (7.79%) and ENAMIC (9.18%) upon longitudinal grinding direction with extra fine and medium diamond grit bur, respectively.
Significance:
The damage tolerance of restorative materials upon adjustments depends on specific mechanical properties and the adjustment procedure. The outcomes of the simulated grinding protocols of this study can be adopted clinically in terms of the selection of appropriate materials, burs and adjustment parameters.
