Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Moral theory and neurology.

B Gert1, W A Nelson, C M Culver

  • 1Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire.

Neurologic Clinics
|November 1, 1989
PubMed
Summary

This study outlines a moral theory to guide neurologists in handling distressing patient information, exploring valid consent, refusal, and when deception may be morally justified.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Asymmetric interactions and their consequences for vital rates and dynamics: the smaller tea tortrix as a model system.

Ecology·2018
Same author

The desirability of a Periscopic quality in correcting lenses.

Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society·2014
Same author

Estimating risks of de novo kidney diseases after living kidney donation.

American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons·2014
Same author

The fitness of drug-resistant malaria parasites in a rodent model: multiplicity of infection.

Journal of evolutionary biology·2011
Same author

Ask the ethicist: would you tell the patients?

Medical ethics (Burlington, Mass.)·2005
Same author

Phylogeny of the Bangia flora of New Zealand suggests a southern origin for Porphyra and Bangia (Bangiales, Rhodophyta).

Molecular phylogenetics and evolution·2004

Area of Science:

  • Bioethics
  • Medical Ethics
  • Neurology

Background:

  • Neurologists frequently encounter situations involving distressing patient information.
  • Ethical decision-making in these contexts requires clear frameworks for consent and refusal.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a general moral theory applicable to neurological practice.
  • To examine the roles of paternalism, valid consent, and refusal in patient care.
  • To provide a procedure for ethically justifying the withholding of information.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a general moral theory.
  • Analysis of concepts: paternalism, consent, and refusal.
  • Application of the theory to clinical scenarios in neurology.
  • Formulation of a decision-making procedure.

Main Results:

  • The proposed moral theory offers a structured approach to ethical dilemmas in neurology.
  • The concepts of paternalism, consent, and refusal are integrated into the theory.
  • A procedure is established to evaluate the moral justification for withholding patient information.

Conclusions:

  • The general moral theory provides a robust framework for neurologists facing complex ethical decisions.
  • Understanding and applying principles of consent and refusal are crucial for ethical patient communication.
  • The outlined procedure aids in determining the moral permissibility of withholding information in specific clinical circumstances.
Keywords:
Analytical ApproachPhilosophical ApproachProfessional Patient Relationship

Related Experiment Videos