Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 15, 2026

Evaluation of an Exclusive Spur Dike U-Turn Design with Radar-Collected Data and Simulation
Published on: February 1, 2020
Estimating safety performance trends over time for treatments at intersections in Florida
Jung-Han Wang1, Mohamed A Abdel-Aty1, Juneyoung Park1
1Department of Civil Environmental Construction Engineering, University of Central Florida, Orlando 4000 Central Florida Blvd, Orlando, FL 32816, USA.
Crash Modification Factors (CMFs) for intersection signalization and Red Light Running Cameras (RLCs) show time-dependent safety effects. The ARMA model effectively predicts long-term trends, revealing a lag in safety performance after treatment implementation.
Area of Science:
- Traffic Safety Engineering
- Transportation Planning
- Statistical Modeling
Background:
- Crash Modification Factors (CMFs) are crucial for evaluating safety treatments like intersection signalization and Red Light Running Cameras (RLCs).
- Previous research indicates these treatments can alter crash types, increasing rear-end collisions while decreasing angle crashes.
- Observed variations in CMFs over time necessitate dynamic analysis of treatment effectiveness.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the temporal trends of CMFs for intersection signalization and RLC implementation.
- To assess the long-term safety performance and identify potential lag effects of these traffic safety treatments.
- To evaluate the predictive capability of the ARMA time series model for CMF trends.
Main Methods:
- CMFs were calculated monthly and using 90-day moving windows for signalization and RLC treatments.
- The Autoregressive Moving Average (ARMA) time series model was employed to analyze and predict CMF trends over time.
- Comparative analysis of CMFs in early versus later periods post-treatment was conducted.
Main Results:
- Signalization CMFs for rear-end crashes initially decreased then increased, while angle crash CMFs showed an opposite trend.
- RLC CMFs for angle crashes decreased over time, stabilizing after an initial increase.
- A significant lag effect was observed for RLCs, with higher CMFs for total and fatal/injury crashes in the first 18 months compared to the subsequent 18 months.
- The ARMA model demonstrated better prediction accuracy for CMFs calculated using 90-day moving windows.
Conclusions:
- Traffic safety treatments like signalization and RLCs exhibit time-varying effectiveness, indicating a lag in their full safety impact.
- The ARMA model is a valuable tool for assessing long-term safety performance trends of traffic interventions.
- Long-term evaluation using CMF trends and time series analysis is recommended for accurate safety assessment of traffic treatments.
Related Concept Videos
Survey Safety
Sight Distance in a Vertical Curve
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial...
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Introduction to Vertical Curves
Vertical Curve: Problem Solving

