Comments on how Mack et al. (2015) (do not) see iconic memory
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 15, 2026

Eye Movement Monitoring of Memory
Published on: August 15, 2010
1Institute of Public Law, University of Tartu (Tallinn Branch), Kaarli puiestee 3, Tallinn 10119, Estonia.
Abstract:
In a recent paper (Mack et al., 2015) the effect of attentional manipulations on partial report performance was investigated. The results were interpreted in favor of the stance that an attention-free phenomenal iconic store does not exist. Therefore, the authors argue that consciousness requires attention. Here we question their conclusions both on the methodological and conceptual grounds.
More Related Videos
07:26The Deese-Roediger-McDermott DRM Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory
Published on: January 31, 2017
08:53Using a Classroom-Based Deese Roediger McDermott Paradigm to Assess the Effects of Imagery on False Memories
Published on: November 14, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Eyewitness Memory
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function...
Traumatic Memory
Implicit Memories
One key aspect of implicit...
Sensory Memory
Flashbulb Memory
Autobiographical Memory