Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 15, 2026

5/6 Nephrectomy Using Sharp Bipolectomy Via Midline Laparotomy in Rats
Published on: April 4, 2025
Evaluating renal biopsy-associated hemorrhage complications by the equation and providing an early intervention: a
Chao Wang1, Yang Yang1, Liping Jin1
1Kidney Therapy Center of Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine of Chinese Army, Beidaihe Sanatorium of Beijing Military Region, No. 4, Xihaitan Road, Beidaihe District, Qinhuangdao, Hebei Province, China.
Background:
The aim was to evaluate the risk for major hemorrhage complications (MHC) prior to percutaneous renal biopsy and apply a specific procedure in high-risk patients to decrease their incidence. Hemorrhage complications that required blood transfusion or other interventions were diagnosed as MHC.
Methods:
One retrospective (Group A, n = 1314) and two prospective cohorts (Group B, n = 249 and Group C, n = 422) were involved in the study. Group A was used to establish a risk equation for MHC, Group B to test its performance, and Group C to evaluate the efficacy of the proposed procedure to reduce MHC incidence. Group C was classified, based on the equation, into high-risk (C1) and low-risk (C2) patients, who received different interventions. The intervention in Group C1 consisted of use of 18-gauge needles, a 12-h rest period post-operation, and reptilase injection; in Group C2, 16-gauge needles were used, with a 6-h rest, and no reptilase injection. Group B was also divided into B1 (high-risk) and B2 (low-risk) using the same cut-off, for further comparison.
Results:
(1) In Group A, 4.8% of patients experienced MHC and the equation: Logit (PMHC) = 0.022 × mean arterial pressure (mmHg) + 0.216 × bleeding time (min) - 0.011 × eGFR [ml/(min 1.73 m(2))] - 0.894 × kidney length (cm) - 2.100 × renal cortical thickness (cm) + 6.225 (cutoff = -1.664) was established. (2) The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.848 (95 % CI 0.797-0.890) for Group B. (3) MHC occurred in 4.8 and 2.8% of patients in Group B and C, respectively; Group B1 suffered significantly more frequent gross hematuria, hematoma and MHC than Group C1; however, no significant difference except for large hematoma was found between Groups B2 and C2 for all complications.
Conclusions:
The equation is reliable to predict the risk for MHC; the interventions proposed can decrease the incidence of MHC in high-risk patients.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention
Esophageal Varices-II: Clinical Features and Management
In the initial assessment, a thorough review of the patient's medical history is vital to identify risk factors such as liver disease, alcohol...
Kidney Transplant II: Surgical Procedure
Hemodialysis II: Procedure and Complications
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Acute Kidney Injury V: Interprofessional Care

