Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

707
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
707
Statistical Analysis: Overview01:11

Statistical Analysis: Overview

18.4K
When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
18.4K
Contaminants and Errors01:16

Contaminants and Errors

621
Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
621
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

8.1K
When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
8.1K
Margin of Error01:27

Margin of Error

8.1K
The margin of error is also called the maximum error of an estimate. The margin of error is the maximum possible or expected difference between the observed sample parameter value and the actual population parameter value. For proportion, it is the maximum difference between the value of sample proportion obtained from the data and the true value of population proportion. As the true value of the population parameter is not known, the margin of error is calculated using the sample statistic.
8.1K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

11.5K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
11.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Characterizing updated and living meta-analyses part 1: a methodological scoping review on methods for conducting meta-analyses in updated and living systematic reviews.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same author

A systemic concern with arterial blood gas analysers in patients with increased temperatures that has the potential to adversely impact on patient care: an observational study.

Emergency medicine journal : EMJ·2026
Same author

Artificial Intelligence technologies for assessing skin lesions for referral on the urgent suspected cancer pathway to detect benign lesions and reduce secondary care specialist appointments: early value assessment.

Health technology assessment (Winchester, England)·2026
Same author

Improving patient flow: ethnicity and socio-economic status associated with delayed discharge from hospital in patients with COVID-19 infection: An observational epidemiological study.

Journal of research in nursing : JRN·2025
Same author

Patients with non-White ethnicity and from poorer social classes are sicker at initial presentation to hospital with COVID-19 infection.

Public health·2025
Same author

Anti-VEGF drugs compared with laser photocoagulation for the treatment of diabetic retinopathy: a systematic review and economic analysis.

Health technology assessment (Winchester, England)·2025
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 14, 2026

Detection of Rare Genomic Variants from Pooled Sequencing Using SPLINTER
14:06

Detection of Rare Genomic Variants from Pooled Sequencing Using SPLINTER

Published on: June 23, 2012

15.9K

Quantifying the risk of error when interpreting funnel plots.

Mark Simmonds1

  • 1Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK. mark.simmonds@york.ac.uk.

Systematic Reviews
|April 16, 2015
PubMed
Summary

Visual inspection of funnel plots for publication bias in meta-analyses is unreliable. New statistics showed poor performance, suggesting formal tests are better for assessing bias.

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Medical Research Methodology

Background:

  • Funnel plots are standard tools for detecting publication bias in meta-analyses.
  • Formal evaluation of visual inspection's efficacy in identifying bias is limited.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the reliability of visual inspection of funnel plots for identifying publication bias.
  • To evaluate the performance of two new statistics (Imbalance and Asymmetry Distance) in quantifying bias.

Main Methods:

  • Developed two statistics (Imbalance and Asymmetry Distance) to quantify visual assessment of funnel plot bias.
  • Conducted a simulation study to test the performance of these statistics in identifying publication bias.

Main Results:

  • The new statistics demonstrated high type I error rates and low statistical power.

More Related Videos

Efficient Chromatin Immunoprecipitation using Limiting Amounts of Biomass
14:29

Efficient Chromatin Immunoprecipitation using Limiting Amounts of Biomass

Published on: May 1, 2013

14.8K
A Protocol for Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis to Identify the Appropriate Animal Model for Translational Research
09:35

A Protocol for Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis to Identify the Appropriate Animal Model for Translational Research

Published on: August 16, 2017

18.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 14, 2026

Detection of Rare Genomic Variants from Pooled Sequencing Using SPLINTER
14:06

Detection of Rare Genomic Variants from Pooled Sequencing Using SPLINTER

Published on: June 23, 2012

15.9K
Efficient Chromatin Immunoprecipitation using Limiting Amounts of Biomass
14:29

Efficient Chromatin Immunoprecipitation using Limiting Amounts of Biomass

Published on: May 1, 2013

14.8K
A Protocol for Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis to Identify the Appropriate Animal Model for Translational Research
09:35

A Protocol for Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis to Identify the Appropriate Animal Model for Translational Research

Published on: August 16, 2017

18.5K
  • Performance was only adequate in very large meta-analyses.
  • Visual inspection is unlikely to provide a valid assessment of publication bias.
  • Conclusions:

    • Visual assessment of funnel plots often provides a misleading indication of publication bias.
    • Formal statistical tests for bias are generally preferable in systematic reviews.