Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 14, 2026

Exploring Infant Sensitivity to Visual Language using Eye Tracking and the Preferential Looking Paradigm
Published on: May 15, 2019
Do young children understand relative value comparisons?
Joyce F Benenson1, Henry Markovits2, Bjorn Whitmore3
1Department of Human Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America; Department of Psychology, Emmanuel College, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Insights
Young children can judge relative value but struggle to compare them. Economic game results show young children’s generosity can be influenced by simple procedural changes, cautioning against firm conclusions on their pro-social motives.
Area of Science:
- Developmental Psychology
- Cognitive Science
- Behavioral Economics
Background:
- Understanding relative value is crucial for social and economic judgments.
- Previous research suggests younger children exhibit greater generosity in economic games.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate young children's ability to make relative value judgments and compare them.
- To re-examine children's generosity in economic games and the impact of procedural variations.
Main Methods:
- Children aged 4-7 years were presented with scenarios requiring relative value judgments.
- Participants then compared relative values across different scenarios.
- Economic game performance was analyzed, with procedural modifications implemented.
Main Results:
- Youngest children demonstrated an ability to downgrade reward evaluations based on social comparison.
- Consistent comparison of relative values was observed only in the oldest children.
- Generosity in economic games was replicated, and procedural changes significantly altered young children's choices.
Conclusions:
- Young children can make basic relative value judgments but struggle with higher-order comparisons.
- Conclusions about young children's pro-social motives derived from economic games require cautious interpretation due to procedural sensitivity.
- Future research should consider nuanced methodologies when assessing children's social decision-making.
Abstract:
Many forms of judgments, such as those used in economic games or measures of social comparison, require understanding relative value, as well as the more complex ability to make comparisons between relative values. To examine whether young children can accurately compare relative values, we presented children 4 to 7 years with simple judgments of relative value in two scenarios. Children then were asked to compare the relative values in the two scenarios. Results show that even the youngest children downgraded evaluations of a reward when another has a larger amount, indicating the ability to make relative value judgments. When asked to compare relative values however, only the oldest children were able to make these comparisons consistently. We then extended this analysis to economic game performance. Specifically, previous results using economic games suggest that younger children are more generous than older ones. We replicate this result, and then show that a simple change in procedure, based on the initial study, is sufficient to change young children's choices. Our results strongly suggest that conclusions regarding young children's pro-social motives based on relative value comparisons should be viewed cautiously.
Related Concept Videos
Piaget's Stage 3 of Cognitive Development
Conservation and Constancy of Quantity
A significant cognitive milestone in the...
Piaget's Stage 2 of Cognitive Development
Relative Frequency Histogram
Inequalities
Estimation of the Physical Quantities
Piaget's Stage 1 of Cognitive Development
Exploration...

