Is 3D MPRAGE better than the combination DIR/PSIR for cortical lesion detection at 3T MRI?

Flavia Nelson1, Aziz Poonawalla2, Sushmita Datta2

  • 1Multiple Sclerosis Research Group, Department of Neurology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.

Abstract

Insights

Double inversion recovery with phase sensitive inversion recovery (DIR/PSIR) at 3T detects more cortical lesions in multiple sclerosis (MS) than 3D MPRAGE. DIR/PSIR offers superior sensitivity for MS cortical lesion detection compared to 3D MPRAGE.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroimaging
  • Radiology
  • Neurology

Background:

  • Advanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences improve cortical lesion (CL) detection in multiple sclerosis (MS).
  • Double inversion recovery (DIR) combined with phase sensitive inversion recovery (PSIR) at 3T enhances sensitivity and specificity for CL detection.
  • Previous studies suggested 3D magnetization prepared rapid acquisition with gradient echo (MPRAGE) improved classification specificity for intracortical (IC) and mixed (MX) lesions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To directly compare the detection capabilities of 3D MPRAGE and DIR/PSIR sequences at 3T for cortical lesions in MS.
  • To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of each sequence in identifying and classifying MS-related cortical lesions.

Main Methods:

  • Eleven subjects with MS were scanned using both DIR/PSIR and 3D MPRAGE sequences on a 3T MRI scanner.
  • Images from each sequence were independently reviewed twice, with only consistently detected lesions scored.
  • The review time for DIR/PSIR was approximately 5 minutes, while for 3D MPRAGE it was approximately 15 minutes per scan.

Main Results:

  • DIR/PSIR identified a total of 141 CL (62 IC, 79 MX), whereas 3D MPRAGE identified 93 CL (38 IC, 55 MX).
  • 3D MPRAGE under-detected CL in seven patients and over-detected in three, with only one patient showing identical CL counts across both sequences.
  • Cortical lesions appeared to have a lower contrast-to-noise ratio on MPRAGE images compared to DIR/PSIR.

Conclusions:

  • The combination of DIR/PSIR at 3T is superior to 3D MPRAGE for detecting cortical gray matter lesions in MS.
  • DIR/PSIR demonstrates higher sensitivity for detecting MS cortical lesions compared to 3D MPRAGE.
  • The inferior contrast-to-noise ratio of CL on MPRAGE images contributes to its reduced detection performance.

Related Concept Videos