Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 14, 2026

Characterize Disease-related Mutants of RAF Family Kinases by Using a Set of Practical and Feasible Methods
Published on: July 17, 2019
Targeting RAS Membrane Association: Back to the Future for Anti-RAS Drug Discovery?
Adrienne D Cox1, Channing J Der1, Mark R Philips2
1University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. adrienne_cox@med.unc.edu cjder@med.unc.edu mark.philips@nyumc.org.
Abstract:
RAS proteins require membrane association for their biologic activity, making this association a logical target for anti-RAS therapeutics. Lipid modification of RAS proteins by a farnesyl isoprenoid is an obligate step in that association, and is an enzymatic process. Accordingly, farnesyltransferase inhibitors (FTI) were developed as potential anti-RAS drugs. The lack of efficacy of FTIs as anticancer drugs was widely seen as indicating that blocking RAS membrane association was a flawed approach to cancer treatment. However, a deeper understanding of RAS modification and trafficking has revealed that this was an erroneous conclusion. In the presence of FTIs, KRAS and NRAS, which are the RAS isoforms most frequently mutated in cancer, become substrates for alternative modification, can still associate with membranes, and can still function. Thus, FTIs failed not because blocking RAS membrane association is an ineffective approach, but because FTIs failed to accomplish that task. Recent findings regarding RAS isoform trafficking and the regulation of RAS subcellular localization have rekindled interest in efforts to target these processes. In particular, improved understanding of the palmitoylation/depalmitoylation cycle that regulates RAS interaction with the plasma membrane, endomembranes, and cytosol, and of the potential importance of RAS chaperones, have led to new approaches. Efforts to validate and target other enzymatically regulated posttranslational modifications are also ongoing. In this review, we revisit lessons learned, describe the current state of the art, and highlight challenging but promising directions to achieve the goal of disrupting RAS membrane association and subcellular localization for anti-RAS drug development. Clin Cancer Res; 21(8); 1819-27. ©2015 AACR. See all articles in this CCR Focus section, "Targeting RAS-Driven Cancers."
Insights
Targeting RAS protein membrane association is a promising anti-cancer strategy. Farnesyltransferase inhibitors failed, but new approaches targeting RAS modification and trafficking show potential for effective cancer therapeutics.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Molecular Biology
- Drug Development
Background:
- RAS proteins need membrane association for activity, making it a therapeutic target.
- Farnesyltransferase inhibitors (FTIs) were developed to block RAS lipid modification and membrane association.
- Previous FTI failure suggested blocking RAS membrane association was flawed, but this is now understood to be incorrect.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review lessons learned from past anti-RAS drug development efforts.
- To describe the current state of targeting RAS protein modification and trafficking.
- To highlight new directions for anti-RAS drug development focused on disrupting RAS membrane association and localization.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing literature on RAS protein modification, trafficking, and inhibition.
- Analysis of the mechanisms by which RAS proteins associate with membranes.
- Exploration of novel therapeutic strategies targeting post-translational modifications and protein interactions.
Main Results:
- FTIs failed because they did not fully block RAS membrane association; KRAS and NRAS can undergo alternative modifications.
- Understanding of RAS isoform trafficking and regulation of subcellular localization has advanced significantly.
- The palmitoylation/depalmitoylation cycle and RAS chaperones are key regulators of RAS membrane interaction.
Conclusions:
- Blocking RAS membrane association remains a valid therapeutic strategy.
- New approaches targeting RAS post-translational modifications and trafficking offer promising avenues for anti-cancer drug development.
- Further research into RAS chaperones and alternative modification pathways is crucial for effective anti-RAS therapies.
More Related Videos
06:44Author Spotlight: Integrating BRET-Based Assays and Rare Mutation Analysis to Decipher RAF Kinase Regulation in Live Cells
Published on: March 1, 2024
09:58An Efficient Protocol to Assess ERK Activity Modulation in Early Zebrafish Noonan Syndrome Models via Live FRET Microscopy and Immunofluorescence
Published on: May 2, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Rab Proteins
Rab proteins switch between a cytosolic, GDP-bound inactive state and a membrane-anchored, GTP-bound active state. By themselves, Rabs show slow rates of GDP/GTP exchange and GTP hydrolysis. Thus, Rab proteins are considered...
The Ras Gene
Ras is a...
Small GTPases - Ras and Rho
Three regulatory proteins control their activity:
Rab Cascades
The Ras Gene
Structure-Activity Relationships and Drug Design
SAR studies the intricate relationship between a drug's chemical structure and biological activity. It focuses on understanding how modifications to a drug's structure can influence...