Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 14, 2026

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
Post-trial access to treatment for patients participating in clinical trials
Dinesh Chandra Doval1, Rashmi Shirali1, Rupal Sinha2
1Department of Medical Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, India.
Abstract:
Clinical trials are the mainstay for bringing out newer and better drugs to serve the mankind. By virtue of participating in a clinical trial, a patient receives access to the newer drugs/therapies, but nothing is generally being offered to them once their participation in the study comes to an end. Though the issue of post-trial access to treatment by patients participating in a clinical trial is debatable, there is no compelling justification either for or against it. We examined a case study in order to evaluate the applicability of post-trial access to treatment for patients participating in clinical trials. The provision of post-trial access to treatment should also keep into consideration the compassionate use of drugs on humanitarian grounds, especially in cases of trial drugs that have offered significant benefit to the trial patients and whose termination would lead to deterioration in patient's overall condition. In the present era of personalized medicine, the incorporation of genetic testing into clinical practice further authenticates the rationale of compassionate use of drugs and post-trial access to treatment.
Insights
Patients in clinical trials often lack access to beneficial treatments after study completion. This case study explores compassionate use and personalized medicine to justify continued treatment post-trial.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Pharmacology
- Medical Ethics
Background:
- Clinical trials are crucial for developing new drugs.
- Patients often lose access to investigational treatments upon study conclusion.
- The ethics of post-trial treatment access remain debated.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the applicability of post-trial treatment access for clinical trial participants.
- To examine the role of compassionate use in patient care after trials.
- To assess the impact of personalized medicine on post-trial access.
Main Methods:
- Case study analysis.
- Review of ethical considerations for post-trial access.
- Exploration of compassionate use principles.
Main Results:
- Post-trial access is a complex issue with no definitive consensus.
- Compassionate use is justifiable for patients benefiting significantly from trial drugs.
- Personalized medicine and genetic testing support the rationale for continued treatment.
Conclusions:
- Post-trial access to treatment warrants consideration, particularly on humanitarian grounds.
- Compassionate use is a key ethical consideration for drugs offering substantial patient benefit.
- Integrating genetic insights strengthens the argument for continued access in personalized medicine.
More Related Videos
06:28E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
08:29Ex Vivo Treatment Response of Primary Tumors and/or Associated Metastases for Preclinical and Clinical Development of Therapeutics
Published on: October 2, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Blinding
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Treatment Resistent Cancers
Preclinical Development: Overview