Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 14, 2026

Force and Position Control in Humans - The Role of Augmented Feedback
Published on: June 19, 2016
The impact of the stimulation frequency on closed-loop control with electrotactile feedback
Liliana P Paredes1, Strahinja Dosen2, Frank Rattay3
1Laboratorio di Cinematica e Robotica, Fondazione Ospedale San Camillo - I.R.C.C.S., Lido di Venezia, Italy. lparede@gwdg.de.
High stimulation frequency is crucial for effective electrotactile feedback in prosthetic users, enhancing control performance. Lower sampling rates are acceptable when paired with high stimulation frequencies, optimizing information transfer.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Biomedical Engineering
- Rehabilitation Technology
Background:
- Electrotactile stimulation provides sensory feedback to prosthetic users by transmitting prosthesis state information via pulse trains.
- Stimulation frequency is a key parameter influencing data transmission rate and the quality of tactile sensations in electrotactile feedback systems.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of stimulation frequency on users' ability to utilize electrotactile feedback for closed-loop prosthetic control.
- To determine the optimal balance between stimulation frequency and tracking error sampling rate for effective prosthetic limb control.
Main Methods:
- Ten healthy subjects performed compensatory tracking tasks using visual or electrotactile feedback.
- Seven conditions varied stimulation frequency (FSTIM) and tracking error sampling rate (FTE).
- Tracking performance was quantified using Squared Pearson Correlation Coefficient (SPCC), Normalized Root Mean Square Tracking Error (NRMSTE), and time delay (TDIO).
Main Results:
- Stimulation frequency (FSTIM) significantly impacted control performance more than tracking error sampling rate (FTE).
- Lowering stimulation frequency degraded tracking quality (SPCC decreased, NRMSTE and TDIO increased).
- Performance recovered when low-rate sampled data was transmitted at high stimulation frequencies.
Conclusions:
- Stimulation frequency critically affects tactile perception quality and information transfer rate in electrotactile feedback.
- Optimal parameters suggest transmitting feedback variables at high stimulation frequencies (>25 Hz) but allowing lower sampling rates (e.g., 5 Hz).
- Findings can guide the selection of system parameters for somatosensory feedback in upper limb prostheses.
Related Concept Videos
Muscle Stimulation Frequency
Wave summation
At low firing rates, motor neurons induce individual twitch contractions in muscle fibers. These twitches...
Effects of feedback
Feedback significantly modifies the gain of a control system. The gain of a system without feedback is altered by a factor of one plus GH, where G represents...
Open and closed-loop control systems
An open-loop control system operates without feedback from the output. It consists of two primary elements: the controller and the controlled process. The controller receives an input signal...
Feedback control systems
Linear feedback systems are theoretical models that simplify analysis and design. These systems operate under the principle that their output is directly proportional to their input within certain ranges. For instance, an amplifier in a control system behaves linearly as long as the input signal remains within a specific range. However, most physical systems exhibit inherent nonlinearity...
Motor Unit Stimulation
The latent period of contraction marks the onset of excitation-contraction coupling, when the action potential propagates across the sarcolemma, preparing the muscle fibers for contraction. As the fibers enter the contraction phase, the...

