Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Aortic arch replacement with descending thoracic aorta stenting for chronic dissection: early outcomes.

Journal of cardiothoracic surgery·2026
Same author

Enhancing Osteoporosis Screening in High-Risk Men Ages 50 Years and Older: A Clinical Decision Support and Workflow Integration Approach.

Journal of primary care & community health·2025
Same author

Implementation of Artificial Intelligence in Writing Letters of Recommendation.

Cureus·2025
Same author

Frailty Assessment and Outcomes During a COVID-19 Outbreak in a Long-Term Care Facility: The FRAIL-LTCF Scale.

Journal of the American Medical Directors Association·2025
Same author

Meta-analysis of defocus curves of monofocal, enhanced monofocal and extended depth of focus IOLs.

BMJ open ophthalmology·2025
Same author

A review of angle kappa and multifocal intraocular lenses and their effect on visual outcomes.

Acta ophthalmologica·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 14, 2026

Stereoacuity Improvement using Random-Dot Video Games
06:25

Stereoacuity Improvement using Random-Dot Video Games

Published on: January 14, 2020

15.3K

Accommodation and pupil responses to random-dot stereograms.

Rajaraman Suryakumar1, Robert Allison1

  • 1Center for Vision Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Journal of Optometry
|April 21, 2015
PubMed
Summary

Pupil size constricts and accommodation increases when viewing 3D images, regardless of crossed or uncrossed disparity. These visual responses are driven by perceived depth, not simulated distance.

Keywords:
AccommodationAcomodaciónDisparidadDisparityEstereopsisFoto-refracciónPhotorefractionPupilPupilaStereopsis

More Related Videos

Comparison of Three Clinical Stereoscopic Methods for Measuring Binocular Visual Function During Amblyopic Treatment in Unilateral Amblyopia
06:19

Comparison of Three Clinical Stereoscopic Methods for Measuring Binocular Visual Function During Amblyopic Treatment in Unilateral Amblyopia

Published on: September 27, 2024

654
Measuring Sensitivity to Viewpoint Change with and without Stereoscopic Cues
08:04

Measuring Sensitivity to Viewpoint Change with and without Stereoscopic Cues

Published on: December 4, 2013

4.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 14, 2026

Stereoacuity Improvement using Random-Dot Video Games
06:25

Stereoacuity Improvement using Random-Dot Video Games

Published on: January 14, 2020

15.3K
Comparison of Three Clinical Stereoscopic Methods for Measuring Binocular Visual Function During Amblyopic Treatment in Unilateral Amblyopia
06:19

Comparison of Three Clinical Stereoscopic Methods for Measuring Binocular Visual Function During Amblyopic Treatment in Unilateral Amblyopia

Published on: September 27, 2024

654
Measuring Sensitivity to Viewpoint Change with and without Stereoscopic Cues
08:04

Measuring Sensitivity to Viewpoint Change with and without Stereoscopic Cues

Published on: December 4, 2013

4.9K

Area of Science:

  • Vision Science
  • Ophthalmology
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • The relationship between binocular disparity, perceived depth, and accompanying oculomotor responses like accommodation and pupil size changes is complex.
  • Understanding these responses is crucial for diagnosing and managing visual dysfunctions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the dynamics of accommodative and pupillary responses to random-dot stereograms with crossed and uncrossed disparity.
  • To determine if these responses are driven by perceived depth or simulated distance.

Main Methods:

  • Monocular photorefraction was used to measure accommodation and pupil size in six visually normal young adults.
  • Subjects viewed random-dot stereograms that changed from a flat plane to a sinusoidal depth corrugation.

Main Results:

  • Increased disparity led to pupil constriction for both crossed and uncrossed disparities, with no significant difference between conditions.
  • Pupil size changes were accompanied by a small increase in accommodation.
  • Pupil response dynamics varied with initial pupil diameter, indicating non-linearity.

Conclusions:

  • Accommodative and pupillary responses are driven by apparent depth, not shifts in mean simulated distance.
  • Pupil constriction likely aids depth of focus for stimuli extended in depth, with associated accommodation changes.
  • Initial pupil diameter influences response dynamics, highlighting non-linear pupil behavior.