Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 14, 2026

07:16
Single Sensillum Recordings for Locust Palp Sensilla Basiconica
Published on: June 23, 2018
8.9K
The contrast sensitivity function of the praying mantis Sphodromantis lineola
Vivek Nityananda1, Ghaith Tarawneh, Lisa Jones
1Institute of Neuroscience, Henry Wellcome Building for Neuroecology, Newcastle University, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK, vivek.nityananda@ncl.ac.uk.
Summary
Praying mantises detect visual motion with contrast sensitivity tuned to spatial and temporal frequencies, not just object velocity. This insect vision differs from bees, showing sensitivity across a broad velocity range.
Area of Science:
- Comparative vision
- Insect neuroethology
- Sensory processing
Background:
- Visual motion detection is crucial for many animals.
- Insect motion detection studies primarily focus on flies and bees.
- Praying mantises, as ambush predators, have unique visual behaviors.
Purpose of the Study:
- To characterize the contrast sensitivity of motion detection in the praying mantis (Sphodromantis lineola).
- To investigate how spatial and temporal frequencies influence mantis motion detection.
- To compare mantis motion detection to that of other insect species.
Main Methods:
- Analyzing the optomotor response of praying mantises.
- Using drifting gratings with varying contrasts, spatial, and temporal frequencies.
- Quantifying contrast sensitivity across different stimulus parameters.
Main Results:
- Mantis contrast sensitivity is dependent on spatial and temporal frequencies.
- Sensitivity is tuned separately to spatial and temporal frequency, not solely to object velocity.
- Mantises exhibit sensitivity to a wide range of velocities, unlike bees.
Conclusions:
- The praying mantis motion detection system is distinct from those of bees and flies.
- Mantis visual ecology may drive specialized motion detection capabilities.
- Further research can elucidate the neural mechanisms underlying mantis motion perception.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Predator-Prey Interactions
22.4K
Predators consume prey for energy. Predators that acquire prey and prey that avoid predation both increase their chances of survival and reproduction (i.e., fitness). Routine predator-prey interactions elicit mutual adaptations that improve predator offenses, such as claws, teeth, and speed, as well as prey defenses, including crypsis, aposematism, and mimicry. Thus, predator-prey interactions resemble an evolutionary arms race.
22.4K
Frequency-dependent Selection
24.5K
When the fitness of a trait is influenced by how common it is (i.e., its frequency) relative to different traits within a population, this is referred to as frequency-dependent selection. Frequency-dependent selection may occur between species or within a single species. This type of selection can either be positive—with more common phenotypes having higher fitness—or negative, with rarer phenotypes conferring increased fitness.
24.5K
Testing a Claim about Mean: Unknown Population SD
6.5K
A complete procedure of testing a hypothesis about a population mean when the population standard deviation is unknown is explained here.
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be approximately normally distributed. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. There is no specific requirement for sample size. But if the sample size is less than 30, and we don't know the population standard deviation, a different approach is used;...
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be approximately normally distributed. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. There is no specific requirement for sample size. But if the sample size is less than 30, and we don't know the population standard deviation, a different approach is used;...
6.5K

