Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Hebephilia: A Postmortem Dissection.

Patrick Singy1

  • 1Union College, Schenectady, NY, 12308, USA, pbsingy@gmail.com.

Archives of Sexual Behavior
|April 21, 2015
PubMed
Summary

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) rejected hebephilia due to its potential social and forensic impact, not solely on scientific evidence. Political considerations are crucial for diagnostic category inclusion.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

What's wrong with sex?

Archives of sexual behavior·2010
Same author

The history of masturbation: an essay review.

Journal of the history of medicine and allied sciences·2004
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Psychiatry
  • Psychology
  • Sociology

Background:

  • The concept of hebephilia, defined as an erotic preference for pubescent children, was proposed for DSM-5 inclusion in 2008.
  • The American Psychiatric Association's Board of Trustees ultimately rejected the proposal, maintaining the existing diagnostic status quo.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the reasons behind the rejection of hebephilia for DSM-5 inclusion.
  • To examine the existence and disease status of hebephilia.
  • To evaluate the potential social consequences of including hebephilia in the DSM.

Main Methods:

  • Critical analysis of the arguments for and against hebephilia's inclusion in the DSM-5.
  • Examination of the scientific, social, and forensic implications of diagnostic categorization.
  • Discussion of the political nature of diagnostic decisions within the DSM framework.

Main Results:

  • The rejection was likely due to the dismissal of the social and forensic consequences, rather than solely on the scientific debate about hebephilia's existence or disease status.
  • The DSM is not purely a research manual; its categories are subject to broader societal and political considerations.

Conclusions:

  • Failure to adequately address the social and forensic impact was a critical error in the proposal for hebephilia's inclusion.
  • The decision-making process for including new diagnostic categories in the DSM involves significant political and social dimensions.

Related Experiment Videos