Related Experiment Videos
Estimates of historical migration in County Durham
Annals of Human Biology
|November 1, 1989
Summary
Anglican marriage registers underestimate migration between birthplace and marriage. Comparing marriage and baptismal registers revealed migration estimates from marriage records were two to four times higher than those from baptismal records.
Area of Science:
- Historical demography
- Genealogical research methods
- Population studies
Background:
- Anglican marriage registers are often used to study historical migration patterns.
- Accuracy of these registers as migration indicators requires validation.
- Baptismal registers provide detailed parental birthplace information.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the accuracy of Anglican marriage registers in reflecting migration.
- To compare migration estimates derived from marriage vs. baptismal registers.
- To quantify the underestimation of migration by marriage registers.
Main Methods:
- Utilized marriage and annotated baptismal registers from twelve parishes in Northumberland and County Durham (1798-1812).
- Linked individual marriages to subsequent baptisms to track parental origins.
- Applied Wright's Island model to estimate migration (f) from both register types.
Main Results:
- Marriage registers systematically underestimate the extent of migration.
- Migration estimates derived from marriage registers were 2-4 times larger than those from baptismal registers.
- Baptismal registers, documenting parental birthplaces, offer a more accurate migration measure.
Conclusions:
- Anglican marriage registers are unreliable for precise historical migration quantification.
- Baptismal registers offer a more robust dataset for estimating migration between birthplace and marriage.
- Further research should consider utilizing baptismal records for improved demographic analyses.