Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

575
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
575
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

1.1K
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
1.1K
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

342
Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least...
342
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

601
Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures...
601
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

9.4K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
9.4K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

2.2K
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
2.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cryo-EM structure and functional analysis of the chromatin remodeler RSF.

Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology communications·2024
Same author

Effect of Heat Treatment Combined with TG Enzyme Cross-Linking on the Zein-Pea Protein Complex: Physicochemical and Gel Properties.

Gels (Basel, Switzerland)·2024
Same author

Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid exposure leads to downregulation of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA synthase 2 expression and upregulation of markers associated with intestinal carcinogenesis in mouse intestinal tissues.

Chemosphere·2024
Same author

Overexpression of Fatty Acid Synthase Upregulates Glutamine-Fructose-6-Phosphate Transaminase 1 and O-Linked N-Acetylglucosamine Transferase to Increase O-GlcNAc Protein Glycosylation and Promote Colorectal Cancer Growth.

International journal of molecular sciences·2024
Same author

Factors associated with patients' healthcare-seeking behavior and related clinical outcomes under China's hierarchical healthcare delivery system.

Frontiers in public health·2024
Same author

Combined effect of time in target range and variability of systolic blood pressure on cardiovascular outcomes and mortality in patients with hypertension: A prospective cohort study.

Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 14, 2026

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.8K

Accounting for uncertainty in confounder and effect modifier selection when estimating average causal effects in

Chi Wang1,2, Francesca Dominici3, Giovanni Parmigiani3,4

  • 1Department of Biostatistics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, U.S.A.

Biometrics
|April 23, 2015
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a Bayesian method for estimating causal effects in observational studies with many confounders and few data points. The method accurately estimates average causal effects, even with complex interactions, and was applied to brain tumor patient data.

Keywords:
Average causal effectBayesian adjustment for confoundingConfounder selectionTreatment effect heterogeneity

More Related Videos

Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment
06:48

Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: June 25, 2019

10.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 14, 2026

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.8K
Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment
06:48

Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: June 25, 2019

10.0K

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Causal Inference
  • Bayesian Methods

Background:

  • Confounder selection and adjustment are critical for causal effect assessment in observational studies.
  • Existing methods face challenges with numerous potential confounders, limited observations, and interaction uncertainty.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose and evaluate a Bayesian method for estimating average causal effects.
  • To address challenges in observational studies with many confounders, few observations, and potential interactions.
  • To enable estimation of both overall and subpopulation-specific causal effects.

Main Methods:

  • A Bayesian approach is developed, building on prior work.
  • Utilizes a Bayesian bootstrap procedure to integrate over confounder distributions.
  • Applicable to generalized linear models for various exposures and outcomes.

Main Results:

  • The proposed method performs well in small sample size simulations (100-150 observations, 50 covariates).
  • Demonstrates accurate estimation of average causal effects, accounting for noncollapsibility.
  • Successfully applied to Medicare data to assess surgery's effect on brain tumor patient readmissions.

Conclusions:

  • The Bayesian method offers a robust approach for causal effect estimation in complex observational studies.
  • It effectively handles numerous confounders and identifies heterogeneous treatment effects.
  • Provides valuable insights for clinical research, such as evaluating surgical interventions in oncology.