Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 4, 2026

Use of the Operant Orofacial Pain Assessment Device OPAD to Measure Changes in Nociceptive Behavior
Published on: June 10, 2013
A naloxone admixture to prevent opioid-induced pruritus in children: a randomized controlled trial
Nicholas West1, J Mark Ansermino, Roxane R Carr
1Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology & Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, nicholas.west@cw.bc.ca.
Insights
Combining naloxone with morphine in saline did not prevent opioid-induced pruritus (OIP) in children. Separate naloxone administration may be more effective for preventing OIP during continuous opioid infusion or patient-controlled analgesia.
Area of Science:
- Anesthesiology
- Pharmacology
- Pediatric Pain Management
Background:
- Continuous opioid infusion (COI) and patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with morphine can cause opioid-induced pruritus (OIP).
- Separate intravenous naloxone administration can prevent OIP but requires additional equipment.
- Investigating a combined admixture of naloxone and morphine is crucial for simplifying OIP prevention.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine if an admixture of naloxone with morphine in normal saline prevents OIP in children.
- To assess if this admixture affects analgesia or opioid utilization.
- To evaluate a simpler method for OIP prevention in pediatric patients.
Main Methods:
- Randomized controlled trial involving children aged 8-18 years receiving COI/PCA morphine.
- Intervention group received a naloxone-morphine-saline admixture (NOSA); control group received morphine only.
- OIP severity assessed via self-report (modified colour analogue scale), with comparisons of opioid utilization, pain scores, and antipruritic use.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in OIP incidence between the NOSA group (22%) and control group (36%).
- Similar OIP severity, opioid utilization, and pain scores between the two groups.
- Median naloxone dose in the NOSA group was 0.37 μg·kg(-1)·hr(-1).
Conclusions:
- The naloxone-morphine admixture did not reduce OIP incidence or severity in pediatric patients.
- Separate administration of naloxone appears to be a more effective strategy for OIP prevention.
- Further research may be needed to optimize naloxone delivery for OIP prophylaxis.
Purpose:
Morphine administered by continuous opioid infusion (COI) or by patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) is associated with opioid-induced pruritus (OIP). Intravenous naloxone administered separately to the morphine infusion at a dose of 0.25-1.65 μg·kg(-1)·hr(-1) can provide effective prevention from OIP. Nevertheless, this strategy requires a dedicated intravenous line and an additional infusion pump. The purpose of this study was to determine whether an admixture of naloxone with morphine in normal saline administered via COI or PCA would also prevent OIP in children without attenuation of analgesia or increased opioid utilization.
Methods:
In this randomized controlled trial, children meeting the inclusion criteria (aged 8-18 yr, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-III, normal developmental profile and prescribed COI/PCA morphine for postoperative analgesia) were randomized to receive an infusion containing a naloxone, opioid, and saline admixture (NOSA) of 12 μg naloxone per 1 mg morphine per 1 mL normal saline or morphine only (control). The severity of opioid-induced pruritus was assessed by self-report using a modified colour analogue scale (mCAS; score 0-10). The groups were also compared for opioid utilization, pain scores, and administration of antipruritic medications, which were recorded for up to 48 hr or until the COI/PCA was discontinued.
Results:
Ninety-two participants were enrolled in the study. The median [interquartile range] dose of naloxone administered to the NOSA participants was 0.37 [0.30-0.48] μg·kg(-1)·hr(-1). The incidence of OIP, determined by self-report and treatment, was not different between groups: 22% in the NOSA group vs 36% in the control group (mean difference, -15%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -33 to 4; P = 0.164). The severity of opioid-induced pruritus was similar in the two groups, with a median difference in the participants' mean mCAS score of -0.29 (95% CI, -0.75 to 0.26; P = 0.509). Opioid utilization did not differ between groups, with a median difference of -1.35 μg·kg(-1)·hr(-1) (95% CI, -5.85 to 7.55; P = 0.518), and pain scores did not differ, with a median difference of 0.0 (95% CI, -1.0 to 1.5; P = 0.659).
Conclusion:
This admixture of naloxone and morphine in normal saline did not decrease the incidence or severity of OIP in this sample. Separate administration of naloxone may be the more effective strategy for prevention of OIP. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01071057).
More Related Videos
06:29Electrophysiological Measurement of Noxious-evoked Brain Activity in Neonates Using a Flat-tip Probe Coupled to Electroencephalography
Published on: November 29, 2017
04:59Cheek Injection Model for Simultaneous Measurement of Pain and Itch-related Behaviors
Published on: September 27, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Opioid Receptors: Overview
Analgesia and Pain Management
Opioid Analgesics: Synthetic and Semisynthetic Opioids
Drugs Affecting GI Tract Motility: Opioids as Antidiarrheal Agents
Opioids, widely used antidiarrheal agents, mitigate diarrhea by slowing down...
Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: Neurokinin-1 Receptor Antagonists
Pharmaceutical Poisoning: Treatment Strategies