Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Quantification of bone density and mineral content.

H B Bentley1

  • 1General Infirmary, Leeds.

Radiography Today
|January 1, 1989
PubMed
Summary

Densitometry measures trabecular bone, while morphometry assesses cortical bone. Morphometry remains valuable for estimating bone loss, with advanced computer-aided techniques available for sequential studies.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A local congenital anomalies register: monitoring preventive interventions.

Journal of public health medicine·1999
Same author

Radiography education in the United Kingdom.

Radiologic technology·1995
Same author

Reliability of the acetabular teardrop as a landmark.

Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA·1991
Same author

The selection of films and intensifying screens for use as a two-dimensional detector in a computed tomography system.

Radiography today·1988
Same author

A proposed scheme for a first degree in radiographic imaging science. Part 2. Content detail.

Radiography·1988
Same author

A proposed scheme for a first degree in radiographic imaging science.

Radiography·1987

Area of Science:

  • Bone biology and osteoporosis research.

Background:

  • Accurate assessment of bone loss is crucial for managing skeletal health.
  • Differentiating between trabecular and cortical bone measurement is key.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To outline the distinct roles of densitometry and morphometry in bone assessment.
  • To highlight the utility of morphometry in estimating bone loss.
  • To introduce advanced computational methods for sequential bone studies.

Main Methods:

  • Densitometry for trabecular bone site measurement.
  • Morphometry for cortical bone site measurement.

Main Results:

  • Simple morphometry is effective for estimating bone loss.
  • Sophisticated computer-aided techniques enhance sequential bone studies.

Conclusions:

  • Densitometry and morphometry are essential, distinct methods for bone analysis.
  • Morphometry remains a practical tool for assessing bone loss.
  • Advanced computational analysis improves longitudinal bone studies.

Related Experiment Videos