Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 14, 2026

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
Published on: January 28, 2020
An Up to 12-Year Retrospective Follow-Up on Immediately Loaded, Surface-Modified Implants in the Edentulous Mandible
Stefan Vandeweghe1, Peter Hawker2, Hugo De Bruyn1,3,4
1Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dental School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Belgium.
Purpose:
The study aims to evaluate the long-term clinical outcome of immediate loading of implants in the edentulous mandible.
Materials And Methods:
Patients were treated at least 1 year prior to evaluation, with four to five implants and an immediate provisional bridge in the edentulous mandible. They were invited for a clinical examination, which included the removal of the bridge, probing, perio-testing, clinical photographs, and a new radiograph to determine the bone level. Also, patients were requested to answer the OHIP-14 questionnaire to rate their satisfaction with the treatment.
Results:
Forty-six patients (21 men, 25 women), mean age 60 years (SD 8.5, range 43-77), were treated with 211 implants. One implant failed to integrate, resulting in a survival rate of 99.5%. After a mean follow-up of 90 months (SD 45, range 17-143), the mean bone level was 1.17 mm (SD 0.49, range 0.36-4.88). The mean Periotest value was -5.48 (SD 0.883, range -2 to -7). The mean probing depth was 2.04 mm (SD 0.71, range 1.00-8.25). There were 83.3% of the implants that demonstrated no bleeding at probing. Calculus was observed at 13.9% of the abutments. Around one implant (0.5%), suppuration was seen after probing. There was a highly significant correlation between bone loss and probing depth (p < .001). Overall, patients were very satisfied, with 69.6% scoring their treatment as excellent.
Conclusion:
Immediate loading of surface-enhanced implants is a highly predictable and successful treatment modality in the edentulous mandible.
More Related Videos
05:54Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla
Published on: October 18, 2021
06:36Effects of Mechanical Methods Used in Peri-implantitis Treatment on Implant Surface Decontamination and Roughness
Published on: March 14, 2025