Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 14, 2026

09:23
Three-Dimensional Culture Assay to Explore Cancer Cell Invasiveness and Satellite Tumor Formation
Published on: August 18, 2016
11.0K
Canadian cancer screening disparities: a recent historical perspective
Current Oncology (Toronto, Ont.)
|April 25, 2015
Summary
Cancer screening programs in Canada have reduced mortality but created disparities. Vulnerable populations, including low-income and isolated groups, remain underserved by breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening services.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Cancer Epidemiology
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Cancer screening programs (Pap test, mammography, fecal occult blood test) have reduced mortality in Canada.
- These programs have also inadvertently created significant disparities in cancer mortality among certain populations.
- Existing disparities persist, particularly for low-income, isolated, and culturally marginalized groups.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore disparities in breast and cervical cancer screening utilization across Canada.
- To examine preliminary data on disparities in colorectal cancer screening.
- To identify characteristics of populations underserved by organized cancer screening programs.
Main Methods:
- Review of screening utilization data for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers in Canada.
- Analysis of disparities in screening uptake among different demographic and socioeconomic groups.
- Examination of literature on interventions to improve screening participation in vulnerable populations.
Main Results:
- While some disparities (e.g., rural/remote mammography and Pap tests) have decreased, others persist, especially for low-income groups.
- Organized programs reach 80% of women for cervical and 70% for mammography screening.
- Underserved populations for ongoing screening include those with fewer resources, isolation, and less cultural integration.
Conclusions:
- Cancer screening programs in Canada have achieved success but have not eliminated disparities.
- Vulnerable populations remain over-represented among those not participating in regular screening.
- Evidence-based interventions are crucial for increasing screening utilization among underserved groups and reducing cancer burden.
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Prevention
3.1K
3.1K
Cancer Prevention
8.7K
Several factors can increase the risk of cancer in an individual. About 50% of cancer cases can be prevented by adopting a healthy lifestyle, regular exercise, eating healthy, and following a modest cancer prevention diet. Epidemiological studies have consistently shown that populations with vegetable and fruit-rich diets have reduced the incidence of cancer. On the other hand, populations who have a diet rich in animal fat, red meat, junk food, or high calories are predisposed to cancer.
Some...
Some...
8.7K
Cancer Survival Analysis
846
Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
846
Preventive Healthcare Services
2.3K
Preventive healthcare services keep people healthy via frequent check-ups, screening, and counseling. They primarily aid in disease prevention rather than treating an acute or chronic illness. Preventive treatment also keeps individuals productive and energetic, allowing them to work well into their retirement years. Examples of preventive care services include:
2.3K
Longitudinal Research
13.7K
Sometimes we want to see how people change over time, as in studies of human development and lifespan. When we test the same group of individuals repeatedly over an extended period of time, we are conducting longitudinal research. Longitudinal research is a research design in which data-gathering is administered repeatedly over an extended period of time. For example, we may survey a group of individuals about their dietary habits at age 20, retest them a decade later at age 30, and then again...
13.7K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
1.7K
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
1.7K

