Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 14, 2026

Continuous Venous-Arterial Doppler Ultrasound During a Preload Challenge
Published on: January 20, 2023
Influence of intra-abdominal pressure on the specificity of pulse pressure variations to predict fluid responsiveness
Patrick Royer1, Karim Bendjelid, Ruddy Valentino
1From the Medical and Surgical Intensive Care Unit (P.R., R.V., D.R., C.C., H.M.), Fort de France University Hospital, Martinique, French West Indies, France; Intensive Care Service (K.B.), Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland; and Medical Intensive Care Unit (P.R.), Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Groupe Hospitalier Universitaire Cochin Broca Hôtel-Dieu, Paris, France.
Background:
The positive predictive value of pulse pressure variations (ΔPP) to discriminate patients who should respond to volume expansion (VE) may be altered in mechanically ventilated patients. Our goal was to determine whether intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) measurements could discriminate patients with true-positive ΔPP values versus patients with false-positive ΔPP values.
Methods:
We designed a prospective pathophysiologic study in a mixed intensive care unit of a university hospital. Sixteen mechanically ventilated patients with hypotension (SAP, <90 mm Hg) and with ΔPP of 13% or more were included. Cardiac output was assessed using Doppler echocardiography before and after VE; IAP was measured using the bladder pressure method. Patients were classified into two groups according to their response to a standardized VE (500 mL of NaCl 0.9%): responders (≥15% increase in cardiac output) and nonresponders.
Results:
Nine patients (57%) were responders, and seven patients (43%) were nonresponders. Before VE, IAP was statistically higher in nonresponders (15 [11-22] mm Hg vs. 9 [6.5-11] mm Hg; p = 0.008). The area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.9 ± 0.08. In patients with ΔPP of 13% or more, an IAP cutoff value of 10.5 mm Hg discriminated between responders and nonresponders with a sensitivity of 100% (59-100%) and a specificity of 78% (40-97%).
Conclusion:
An increase in IAP of more than 10.5 mm Hg can decrease the positive predictive value of ΔPP. Hence, in patients prone to present abnormal IAP values, IAP should be measured before performing VE directed by the ΔPP marker.
Level Of Evidence:
Diagnostic study, level II.
Related Concept Videos
Measurement of Blood Pressure
Sites for measuring blood pressure
The Brachial Artery: Primary Site for Blood Pressure Measurement
Blood Pressure
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
Pulse
The pulse serves as a clinical...
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(two-step method)

