Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 14, 2026

Upper-extremity Approach for Secondary Access in Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
Published on: August 8, 2025
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with bicuspid aortic valve: A patient level multi-center analysis
Altayyeb Yousef1, Trevor Simard1, John Webb2
1Division of Cardiology, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Objective:
We sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BiAV).
Background:
BiAV remains a relative contraindication to TAVI resulting in exclusion from TAVI trials and thus limiting data on the clinical performance of transcatheter valves in these patients.
Methodology:
We conducted an international patient level multicenter analysis on outcomes in patients with BiAV undergoing TAVI. The primary outcome of the study was the combined early safety endpoint--a composite of 30 day mortality, stroke, life-threatening bleeding, acute kidney injury, coronary artery obstruction, major vascular complication and valve related dysfunction. Secondary endpoints included the individual components of the primary endpoint as well as post-TAVI paravalvular leak (PVL), rehospitalization, new pacemaker insertion and device success rates at 30 days and 1 year.
Results:
A total of 108 patients with BiAV were identified in 21 centers in Canada, Spain, Italy, Poland and Singapore who underwent TAVI between January 2005 and March 2014. The composite primary outcome occurred in one quarter of patients (26.9%)--mainly driven by re-intervention for valve malposition (9.3%). The 30-day and 1 year mortality rates were 8.3% and 16.9% respectively with AR ≥ 3+ occurring in 9.6% of patients. Device success was achieved in 85.2% of cases with pacemaker insertion in 19.4%. While PVL was not associated with an increased risk of 30 day or 1 year mortality--Type I BiAV anatomy with left and right cusp fusion had significantly better outcomes than other valve variants.
Conclusion:
In selected patients with BiAV and severe aortic stenosis, TAVI appears both safe and feasible with acceptable clinical outcomes. Clinical studies of TAVI in this patient population are warranted.
More Related Videos
05:31Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve Replacement from Autologous Pericardium with a Self-Expandable Nitinol Stent in an Adult Sheep Model
Published on: June 8, 2022
08:50Technique and Patient Selection Criteria of Right Anterior Mini-Thoracotomy for Minimal Access Aortic Valve Replacement
Published on: March 26, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management